Hello, I want to say if it's regular when i backup config file with filebucket, the save create more folder. Example : root@client:~# tree /var/testBackup/ /var/testBackup/ ├── 0 │ └── 9 │ └── 6 │ └── 9 │ └── 3 │ └── f │ └── f │ └── d │ └── 09693ffd352436e900afd719c5a5a8b3 │ ├── contents │ └── paths ├── 2 │ └── 5 │ └── 5 │ └── f │ └── 3 │ └── c │ └── 2 │ └── e │ └── 255f3c2e42515586e807f1a39ae58cf2 │ ├── contents │ └── paths It's possible to create this tree ? /var/testBackup/ ├── 255f3c2e42515586e807f1a39ae58cf2 │ └── contents │ └── paths Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Nathan Clemons
2011-Jun-03 14:49 UTC
Re: [Puppet Users] backup files whith bad arborescence
I think this is done because file systems can bog down with too many files (or directories) inside one directory. By breaking down the hierarchy like they do, they help keep performance optimal. -- Nathan Clemons http://www.livemocha.com The worlds largest online language learning community On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:01 AM, florian <grandjean.florian@gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, > I want to say if it''s regular when i backup config file with > filebucket, the save create more folder. > > Example : > root@client:~# tree /var/testBackup/ > /var/testBackup/ > ├── 0 > │ └── 9 > │ └── 6 > │ └── 9 > │ └── 3 > │ └── f > │ └── f > │ └── d > │ └── 09693ffd352436e900afd719c5a5a8b3 > │ ├── contents > │ └── paths > ├── 2 > │ └── 5 > │ └── 5 > │ └── f > │ └── 3 > │ └── c > │ └── 2 > │ └── e > │ └── 255f3c2e42515586e807f1a39ae58cf2 > │ ├── contents > │ └── paths > > It''s possible to create this tree ? > > /var/testBackup/ > ├── 255f3c2e42515586e807f1a39ae58cf2 > │ └── contents > │ └── paths > > > Thanks > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
But it''s possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in performance ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:12 AM, florian wrote:> But it''s possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in > performance ?My understanding is that the answer is "mo" because you''re not even supposed to be using those files directly, so it shouldn''t matter. You should be using the file bucket through puppet instead. Out of curiosity, why do you care? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick <kc7...@gmail.com> wrote:> Out of curiosity, why do you care?i think it damage to keep this arborescence with many intermediate file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Jun 6, 2011, at 12:27 AM, florian wrote:> On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick <kc7...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, why do you care? > > i think it damage to keep this arborescence with many intermediate > file.Do you mean you think it is bad to keep the file structure like this? If so, I still ask why. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
The easiest way I can think of is using your favorite "find" program. I would assume that the unix find program will do this for you. On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:27 AM, florian wrote:> If i dont change this arborescence, how I can find a backup at > specific date ? > > Think > > On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick <kc7...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:12 AM, florian wrote: >> >>> But it''s possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in >>> performance ? >> >> My understanding is that the answer is "mo" because you''re not even supposed to be using those files directly, so it shouldn''t matter. You should be using the file bucket through puppet instead. >> >> Out of curiosity, why do you care?-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.