Hi, Can anyone say if the article http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound is up to date ? I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix to another.... Moty --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Moty schrieb:> > Hi, > > Can anyone say if the article http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound > is up to date ? > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix > to another.... >If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can profit from your work. Regards, DavidS -- dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web: http://dasz.at Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have messages from pound saying: line too long: CN=<puppet client name> line too long: CN=<puppet master name> I''m using: Ubuntu server 9.04 Puppet master and client 0.24.5 Pound 2.4.3 I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF directive limited to 1024 but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. Can anyone suggest ? Moty On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote:> Moty schrieb: > > > > > Hi, > > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound > > is up to date ? > > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix > > to another.... > > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can > profit from your work. > > Regards, DavidS > > -- > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 > > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
FIXED: I had to recompile pound with --enable-cert1l . Probably Ubuntu 9.04 pound distribution is not compiled with that option. Moty On Jun 14, 6:33 pm, Moty <mot...@gmail.com> wrote:> Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... > > I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have > messages from pound saying: > > line too long: CN=<puppet client name> > line too long: CN=<puppet master name> > > I''m using: > > Ubuntu server 9.04 > Puppet master and client 0.24.5 > Pound 2.4.3 > > I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF > directive limited to 1024 > but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. > > Can anyone suggest ? > > Moty > > On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: > > > Moty schrieb: > > > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound > > > is up to date ? > > > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix > > > to another.... > > > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and > > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can > > profit from your work. > > > Regards, DavidS > > > -- > > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at > > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 > > > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Moty<motyla@gmail.com> wrote:> > > FIXED: > > I had to recompile pound with --enable-cert1l . > > Probably Ubuntu 9.04 pound distribution is not compiled with that > option.So Jeff McCune and I got that patch into pound upstream, but found that it was logging lots of spurious errors. This was not the case with our submitted patch, so they changed something when they chose to implement this feature. I spent a while chasing this up with the pound developers on their mailing list, and they showed no interest in actually fixing it. This was a motivating factor in me moving to Passenger instead of Pound/Mongrel, I had little faith that Pound upstream was a project to rely upon.> > > Moty > > On Jun 14, 6:33 pm, Moty <mot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... >> >> I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have >> messages from pound saying: >> >> line too long: CN=<puppet client name> >> line too long: CN=<puppet master name> >> >> I''m using: >> >> Ubuntu server 9.04 >> Puppet master and client 0.24.5 >> Pound 2.4.3 >> >> I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF >> directive limited to 1024 >> but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. >> >> Can anyone suggest ? >> >> Moty >> >> On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: >> >> > Moty schrieb: >> >> > > Hi, >> >> > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound >> > > is up to date ? >> >> > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix >> > > to another.... >> >> > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and >> > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can >> > profit from your work. >> >> > Regards, DavidS >> >> > -- >> > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at >> > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 >> >> > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg >> >> > > >-- Nigel Kersten nigelk@google.com System Administrator Google, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
puppet is ruby based and for most of the sysadmin guys ( including myself ) the abstraction level is very high compare to other system tools. I find pound configuration structure much more easy to understand and the data flow logic more strait forward then embedding puppetmuster as a rack application into apache/passenger. I personaly prefer to keep my puppet infrastructure easy to understand for people who do not know ruby style and can troubleshoot infrastructure problems.... So in short ... pound simplicity is nice and easy Moty On Jun 15, 7:40 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote:> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Moty<mot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > FIXED: > > > I had to recompile pound with --enable-cert1l . > > > Probably Ubuntu 9.04 pound distribution is not compiled with that > > option. > > So Jeff McCune and I got that patch into pound upstream, but found > that it was logging lots of spurious errors. > > This was not the case with our submitted patch, so they changed > something when they chose to implement this feature. > > I spent a while chasing this up with the pound developers on their > mailing list, and they showed no interest in actually fixing it. > > This was a motivating factor in me moving to Passenger instead of > Pound/Mongrel, I had little faith that Pound upstream was a project to > rely upon. > > > > > > > > > Moty > > > On Jun 14, 6:33 pm, Moty <mot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... > > >> I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have > >> messages from pound saying: > > >> line too long: CN=<puppet client name> > >> line too long: CN=<puppet master name> > > >> I''m using: > > >> Ubuntu server 9.04 > >> Puppet master and client 0.24.5 > >> Pound 2.4.3 > > >> I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF > >> directive limited to 1024 > >> but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. > > >> Can anyone suggest ? > > >> Moty > > >> On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: > > >> > Moty schrieb: > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound > >> > > is up to date ? > > >> > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix > >> > > to another.... > > >> > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and > >> > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can > >> > profit from your work. > > >> > Regards, DavidS > > >> > -- > >> > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at > >> > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 > > >> > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg > > -- > Nigel Kersten > nig...@google.com > System Administrator > Google, Inc.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text ---~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Moty<motyla@gmail.com> wrote:> > > puppet is ruby based and for most of the sysadmin guys ( including > myself ) the abstraction level is very high compare to other system > tools. > > I find pound configuration structure much more easy to understand and > the data flow logic more strait forward then embedding puppetmuster as > a rack application into apache/passenger. I personaly prefer to keep > my puppet infrastructure easy to understand for people who do not know > ruby style and can troubleshoot infrastructure problems.... > > So in short ... pound simplicity is nice and easyYes, but you''re hiding the complexity. You''re now dealing with two separate daemons (puppetmasterd-mongrel and pound) that both need to be monitored separately and restarted together at appropriate times. Apache with puppetmasterd as a rack application means you have a single daemon to monitor. I love the pound configuration syntax. I''m just not fond of separate daemons, and had my confidence in the project dented by a lack of response from the maintainers. This is all apart from the fact that passenger/rack with Apache simply performs better than pound/mongrel in my experience.> > Moty > > On Jun 15, 7:40 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Moty<mot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > FIXED: >> >> > I had to recompile pound with --enable-cert1l . >> >> > Probably Ubuntu 9.04 pound distribution is not compiled with that >> > option. >> >> So Jeff McCune and I got that patch into pound upstream, but found >> that it was logging lots of spurious errors. >> >> This was not the case with our submitted patch, so they changed >> something when they chose to implement this feature. >> >> I spent a while chasing this up with the pound developers on their >> mailing list, and they showed no interest in actually fixing it. >> >> This was a motivating factor in me moving to Passenger instead of >> Pound/Mongrel, I had little faith that Pound upstream was a project to >> rely upon. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Moty >> >> > On Jun 14, 6:33 pm, Moty <mot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... >> >> >> I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have >> >> messages from pound saying: >> >> >> line too long: CN=<puppet client name> >> >> line too long: CN=<puppet master name> >> >> >> I''m using: >> >> >> Ubuntu server 9.04 >> >> Puppet master and client 0.24.5 >> >> Pound 2.4.3 >> >> >> I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF >> >> directive limited to 1024 >> >> but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. >> >> >> Can anyone suggest ? >> >> >> Moty >> >> >> On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: >> >> >> > Moty schrieb: >> >> >> > > Hi, >> >> >> > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound >> >> > > is up to date ? >> >> >> > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix >> >> > > to another.... >> >> >> > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and >> >> > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can >> >> > profit from your work. >> >> >> > Regards, DavidS >> >> >> > -- >> >> > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at >> >> > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 >> >> >> > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg >> >> -- >> Nigel Kersten >> nig...@google.com >> System Administrator >> Google, Inc.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > >-- Nigel Kersten nigelk@google.com System Administrator Google, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
The one daemon feature is huge advantage indeed ...... Since I''m in the process of building my envirnment and actually did not spend much time to test the passenger/rack configuration I''ll take your advice and test it again .... 10x Moty On Jun 15, 9:12 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote:> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Moty<mot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > puppet is ruby based and for most of the sysadmin guys ( including > > myself ) the abstraction level is very high compare to other system > > tools. > > > I find pound configuration structure much more easy to understand and > > the data flow logic more strait forward then embedding puppetmuster as > > a rack application into apache/passenger. I personaly prefer to keep > > my puppet infrastructure easy to understand for people who do not know > > ruby style and can troubleshoot infrastructure problems.... > > > So in short ... pound simplicity is nice and easy > > Yes, but you''re hiding the complexity. > > You''re now dealing with two separate daemons (puppetmasterd-mongrel > and pound) that both need to be monitored separately and restarted > together at appropriate times. > > Apache with puppetmasterd as a rack application means you have a > single daemon to monitor. > > I love the pound configuration syntax. I''m just not fond of separate > daemons, and had my confidence in the project dented by a lack of > response from the maintainers. > > This is all apart from the fact that passenger/rack with Apache simply > performs better than pound/mongrel in my experience. > > > > > > > > > Moty > > > On Jun 15, 7:40 pm, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Moty<mot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > FIXED: > > >> > I had to recompile pound with --enable-cert1l . > > >> > Probably Ubuntu 9.04 pound distribution is not compiled with that > >> > option. > > >> So Jeff McCune and I got that patch into pound upstream, but found > >> that it was logging lots of spurious errors. > > >> This was not the case with our submitted patch, so they changed > >> something when they chose to implement this feature. > > >> I spent a while chasing this up with the pound developers on their > >> mailing list, and they showed no interest in actually fixing it. > > >> This was a motivating factor in me moving to Passenger instead of > >> Pound/Mongrel, I had little faith that Pound upstream was a project to > >> rely upon. > > >> > Moty > > >> > On Jun 14, 6:33 pm, Moty <mot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Currently I''m stuck so nothing to write ... > > >> >> I''ve struggled through the signning phase of the client and now I have > >> >> messages from pound saying: > > >> >> line too long: CN=<puppet client name> > >> >> line too long: CN=<puppet master name> > > >> >> I''m using: > > >> >> Ubuntu server 9.04 > >> >> Puppet master and client 0.24.5 > >> >> Pound 2.4.3 > > >> >> I''ve noticed that pound version 2.3 had some issues with MAXBUF > >> >> directive limited to 1024 > >> >> but on this version 2.4 it''s up to 4096 by default. > > >> >> Can anyone suggest ? > > >> >> Moty > > >> >> On Jun 14, 2:16 pm, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote: > > >> >> > Moty schrieb: > > >> >> > > Hi, > > >> >> > > Can anyone say if the articlehttp://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/UsingMongrelPound > >> >> > > is up to date ? > > >> >> > > I''ve started my server according to that and I''m jumping from one fix > >> >> > > to another.... > > >> >> > If you find problems with the procedure, please document the fixes and > >> >> > the software versions you are using in the wiki, so that others can > >> >> > profit from your work. > > >> >> > Regards, DavidS > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web:http://dasz.at > >> >> > Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999 > > >> >> > FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg > > >> -- > >> Nigel Kersten > >> nig...@google.com > >> System Administrator > >> Google, Inc.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > -- > Nigel Kersten > nig...@google.com > System Administrator > Google, Inc.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text ---~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---