Thanks Jean-Marc for the follow up.
+Gustaf (author of the patch), who would have more to say!
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:41 PM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>
wrote:
> Hi Yves,
>
> Sorry for the delay (I blame the Google spam filter). Have you actually
> seen problems that this patch fixes? If so, do you have a way to
> reproduce the problem?
>
> While technically your patch would be safe, the simple fact that it
> would trigger would mean a bug elsewhere. Note that HB_gain is
> essentially 1 - exp(-celt_rate/1024.) where celt_rate is supposed to
> always be non-negative because compute_silk_rate_for_hybrid() should
> never give SILK more bits than there are in total. That means HB_gain
> should be bounded between 0 and 1 and should definitely never be NaN.
>
> So either the patch does nothing (in which case we don't need it), or
it
> does something and there's something much scarier going on than NaNs.
In
> the latter case, I think more investigation is required.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
>
>
> On 9/12/19 1:00 PM, Yves Gerey wrote:
> > Hi, I'm still Yves.
> >
> > This other fix
> > <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1061499/
> > never
> > made it to opus repository.
> >
> > It seems safe and sane enough to be applied to opus master branch.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Warm regards,
> > Yves
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > opus mailing list
> > opus at xiph.org
> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
> >
>
--
Warm regards,
Yves
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20190923/4ef0c7fa/attachment.html>