Drew Allen
2017-Apr-28 16:59 UTC
[opus] [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
My apologies for the confusion, I think I have the mapping layout correct in this patch. Cheers! On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:07 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:> On 25/04/17 10:12 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > > We assume that the input file is ordered first by ACN ambisonic channels > > followed by a (possible) stereo track, and we want to swap the order for > > the API in order to couple the stereo for coding. > > Well, if you look at section 5.1.1 of RFC7845: > > The 'coupled stream > count' field indicates that the decoders for the first M Opus > streams are to be initialized for stereo (two-channel) output, > and the remaining (N - M) decoders are to be initialized for mono > (a single channel) only. > > In other words, it says that in the file itself (regardless of what you > do in the API), you need to have the stereo channels first, followed by > the mono channels. Where the channels go in the API itself is another > question and you're free to put the non-diegetic stereo at the end for > that. > > > The mapping code > > appears to be working on files I've tested it on so far. > > Well, even if you get the mapping wrong, it's still going to work. It's > just that your non-diegetic stream will be made from two mono streams > and two of your directional channels will be coupled. That's one of the > limitations of simple testing, since it's not going to catch these kinds > of errors. > > Jean-Marc >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170428/d22b9a54/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Non-diegetic-support-for-Ambisonics-Mapping-254.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6323 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170428/d22b9a54/attachment.obj>
Jean-Marc Valin
2017-Apr-28 21:31 UTC
[opus] [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
Hi Drew, Thanks for the update. It's merged in master. Jean-Marc On 28/04/17 12:59 PM, Drew Allen wrote:> My apologies for the confusion, I think I have the mapping layout > correct in this patch. > > Cheers! > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:07 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > On 25/04/17 10:12 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > > We assume that the input file is ordered first by ACN ambisonic > channels > > followed by a (possible) stereo track, and we want to swap the > order for > > the API in order to couple the stereo for coding. > > Well, if you look at section 5.1.1 of RFC7845: > > The 'coupled stream > count' field indicates that the decoders for the first M Opus > streams are to be initialized for stereo (two-channel) output, > and the remaining (N - M) decoders are to be initialized for mono > (a single channel) only. > > In other words, it says that in the file itself (regardless of what you > do in the API), you need to have the stereo channels first, followed by > the mono channels. Where the channels go in the API itself is another > question and you're free to put the non-diegetic stereo at the end > for that. > > > The mapping code > > appears to be working on files I've tested it on so far. > > Well, even if you get the mapping wrong, it's still going to work. It's > just that your non-diegetic stream will be made from two mono streams > and two of your directional channels will be coupled. That's one of the > limitations of simple testing, since it's not going to catch these kinds > of errors. > > Jean-Marc >
Jean-Marc Valin
2017-Apr-28 21:43 UTC
[opus] [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
Oops, looks like we both should have been more careful. The patch had some extra lines that shouldn't have been there. Jean-Marc On 28/04/17 12:59 PM, Drew Allen wrote:> My apologies for the confusion, I think I have the mapping layout > correct in this patch. > > Cheers! > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:07 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > On 25/04/17 10:12 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > > We assume that the input file is ordered first by ACN ambisonic > channels > > followed by a (possible) stereo track, and we want to swap the > order for > > the API in order to couple the stereo for coding. > > Well, if you look at section 5.1.1 of RFC7845: > > The 'coupled stream > count' field indicates that the decoders for the first M Opus > streams are to be initialized for stereo (two-channel) output, > and the remaining (N - M) decoders are to be initialized for mono > (a single channel) only. > > In other words, it says that in the file itself (regardless of what you > do in the API), you need to have the stereo channels first, followed by > the mono channels. Where the channels go in the API itself is another > question and you're free to put the non-diegetic stereo at the end > for that. > > > The mapping code > > appears to be working on files I've tested it on so far. > > Well, even if you get the mapping wrong, it's still going to work. It's > just that your non-diegetic stream will be made from two mono streams > and two of your directional channels will be coupled. That's one of the > limitations of simple testing, since it's not going to catch these kinds > of errors. > > Jean-Marc >
Drew Allen
2017-Apr-28 23:54 UTC
[opus] [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
Hey Jean-Marc, sorry about that... extra lines... was it whitespace? If so, sorry about that. Thanks! Cheers, Drew Cheers, Drew On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:> Oops, looks like we both should have been more careful. The patch had > some extra lines that shouldn't have been there. > > Jean-Marc > > On 28/04/17 12:59 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > My apologies for the confusion, I think I have the mapping layout > > correct in this patch. > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:07 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > > > On 25/04/17 10:12 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > > > We assume that the input file is ordered first by ACN ambisonic > > channels > > > followed by a (possible) stereo track, and we want to swap the > > order for > > > the API in order to couple the stereo for coding. > > > > Well, if you look at section 5.1.1 of RFC7845: > > > > The 'coupled stream > > count' field indicates that the decoders for the first M Opus > > streams are to be initialized for stereo (two-channel) output, > > and the remaining (N - M) decoders are to be initialized for > mono > > (a single channel) only. > > > > In other words, it says that in the file itself (regardless of what > you > > do in the API), you need to have the stereo channels first, followed > by > > the mono channels. Where the channels go in the API itself is another > > question and you're free to put the non-diegetic stereo at the end > > for that. > > > > > The mapping code > > > appears to be working on files I've tested it on so far. > > > > Well, even if you get the mapping wrong, it's still going to work. > It's > > just that your non-diegetic stream will be made from two mono streams > > and two of your directional channels will be coupled. That's one of > the > > limitations of simple testing, since it's not going to catch these > kinds > > of errors. > > > > Jean-Marc > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170428/a72a25cd/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
- [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
- [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
- [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254
- [Patch] Non-diegetic support for channel mapping 254