> > Are you sure??No, I'm confused. :-/ With shallow clones:- opus PACKAGE_VERSION="aee4d80" opus-tools PACKAGE_VERSION="7c3f522" Something's gone wrong. opus-tools is broken. configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met: Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80
On 2013-10-01 5:27 PM, bat guano wrote:> opus-tools is broken. > > configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met: > Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80"You're in the bottom of a well, surrounded by yaks." Well, I'm back to keeping a hard-coded fallback version string in the repo. Anyone else? -r
I vote for "don't clone with depth 1". There's no way we're going to catch all of these anyway. Jean-Marc On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:> On 2013-10-01 5:27 PM, bat guano wrote: > >> opus-tools is broken. >> >> configure: error: Package requirements (opus>= 1.0.3) were not met: >> Requested 'opus>= 1.0.3' but version of Opus is aee4d80 > > "You're in the bottom of a well, surrounded by yaks." > > Well, I'm back to keeping a hard-coded fallback version string in the > repo. Anyone else? > > -r > _______________________________________________ > opus mailing list > opus at xiph.org > lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus >