search for: yak

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 66 matches for "yak".

Did you mean: ak
2005 Dec 21
1
ustack() issues && correlating SIGSEGV activity?
...foo.d -c ./fluffy fluff: 20a30 [ * ] A bad function is Freeing memory at address ff3f1298n ld.so.1`free ld.so.1`setup+0x13ac ld.so.1`_setup+0x3b0 ld.so.1`_rt_boot+0x88 Does anyone happen to know why the ustack() doesn''t show lex, yak, main and _start? Also -- is there a way to use DTrace to trace access to memory and correlate that back to the instruction and function that accessed it (e.g., finding the culprit of a SIGSEGV without gdb)? Thanks for any insight, - Ryan -- UNIX Administrator http://daemons.net/~matty [1] $...
2016 Nov 13
0
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
...16 00:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > On 12 November 2016 at 22:54, Kirill M?ller wrote: > | > > | > [... lots of stuff deleted ...] > | > > | > | I noticed this because plogr logging crashed in dplyr (compiled with > gcc > | > | 6) right after upgrading to yakkety; I still had a gcc-5 built > version > | > | of Rcpp installed. As soon as I added -std, everything worked as > before. > | > | No minimal example, sorry. Don't we need "-std=c++98" in Makevars > | > | anyway, even if it's just to avoid users using C++1...
2016 Nov 12
0
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
On 11 November 2016 at 23:48, Kirill M?ller wrote: | After upgrading to Ubuntu 16.10, which brings GCC 6, I've noticed that | packages are compiled in C++14 mode by default. Here's what a g++ | command for compiling one of Rcpp's modules look like on my system: | | g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I../inst/include/ -fpic -g -O2 | -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
2016 Nov 12
0
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
On 13.11.2016 00:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 12 November 2016 at 22:54, Kirill M?ller wrote: > > [... lots of stuff deleted ...] > > | I noticed this because plogr logging crashed in dplyr (compiled with gcc > | 6) right after upgrading to yakkety; I still had a gcc-5 built version > | of Rcpp installed. As soon as I added -std, everything worked as before. > | No minimal example, sorry. Don't we need "-std=c++98" in Makevars > | anyway, even if it's just to avoid users using C++11 constructs and then > | wo...
2016 May 19
7
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership
...ep development running smoothly, I am resigning my code ownership. Justin Bogner has graciously volunteered to take it up. He has a strong history of LLVM contributions, a demonstrated commitment to good community development practices, and has experience shaving the infinite herd of SelectionDAG yaks. I am happy to recommend Justin take over the SelectionDAG code ownership, pending the approval of the community. —Owen
2016 Nov 12
2
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
...Kirill M?ller wrote: | On 13.11.2016 00:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 12 November 2016 at 22:54, Kirill M?ller wrote: | > | > [... lots of stuff deleted ...] | > | > | I noticed this because plogr logging crashed in dplyr (compiled with gcc | > | 6) right after upgrading to yakkety; I still had a gcc-5 built version | > | of Rcpp installed. As soon as I added -std, everything worked as before. | > | No minimal example, sorry. Don't we need "-std=c++98" in Makevars | > | anyway, even if it's just to avoid users using C++11 constructs and then | &...
2016 Nov 12
2
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
On 12 November 2016 at 22:54, Kirill M?ller wrote: [... lots of stuff deleted ...] | I noticed this because plogr logging crashed in dplyr (compiled with gcc | 6) right after upgrading to yakkety; I still had a gcc-5 built version | of Rcpp installed. As soon as I added -std, everything worked as before. | No minimal example, sorry. Don't we need "-std=c++98" in Makevars | anyway, even if it's just to avoid users using C++11 constructs and then | wondering why thei...
2016 Nov 12
0
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
...rpowered) box to 16.10 as a first > test. No issues so far, and basic cppFunction("...") tests with Rcpp work. > > Could you get us a minimal reproducible example of what broke without the > explicit -std=c++98 ? > When I posted, there was only "xenial", not "yakkety", on CRAN. This has changed now (thanks a lot!). When I try to upgrade, I'm presented with the following diff of /etc/R/Makeconf (excerpt), which looks *very* strange to me. -# configure '--prefix=/usr' '--with-cairo' '--with-jpeglib' '--with-readline&...
2012 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress. If > people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that > at some later time. No reason to block your progress as long as the API is > good. I was trying to give feedback on the API, and specifically suggest an alternative that might be both easier to use, and naturally dovetail with an upcoming standa...
2016 Nov 12
3
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
Thanks. I have now CXX = g++ -std=c++98 in my /etc/R/Makeconf, it's picked up properly. I can only assume that the last -std= option wins if more than one are given on the same command line [1]. -Kirill [1] http://stackoverflow.com/q/40563269/946850 On 12.11.2016 03:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 11 November 2016 at 23:48, Kirill M?ller wrote: > | After upgrading to Ubuntu
2016 Nov 12
2
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
On 12 November 2016 at 07:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 12 November 2016 at 14:23, Kirill M?ller wrote: | | Thanks. I have now CXX = g++ -std=c++98 in my /etc/R/Makeconf, it's | | picked up properly. I can only assume that the last -std= option wins if | | more than one are given on the same command line [1]. | | Good to know it works. | | I am still a little puzzled why it was
2016 Nov 11
3
Ubuntu 16.10 Yakkety Yak uses GCC 6 but -std=c++98 is missing
After upgrading to Ubuntu 16.10, which brings GCC 6, I've noticed that packages are compiled in C++14 mode by default. Here's what a g++ command for compiling one of Rcpp's modules look like on my system: g++ -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I../inst/include/ -fpic -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -c
2003 Dec 02
3
check WARNING...
...x ... OK WARNING: There were 3 warnings, see C://cruisepak.Rcheck/00check.log for details C:\> I can fix the other two warnings with no problem, but the S3 generic/method consistency warning is puzzling me... . I have a function called plot.summaries <- function( trees, sp=NULL ) { ...yak, kay, yak... } and I'm not sure if this is causing the problem. I'm developing a package for forestry and the field makes use of many terms commonly found in technology (logs, trees, plots, points, etc) and would like to know if the nomenclature will cause a problem. Thanks, Jeff. --- J...
2006 Feb 24
4
Rails Newbie Forum?
...ert) to Rails. I''ve got the book, have read it, done bits and pieces of the demo, and tried to apply it to a rather complicated DB I''ve got here. I''ve got a ton of questions, and before I bore everyone here, is there a dedicated forum for Rails newbies to get help? Yak -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2007 May 09
2
Thunderbird or Dovecot bug? (multiple keywords)
...ve that the problem has something to do with the difference of dovecot-keywords content, and the interaction TBird has with Dovecot. My account, working correctly, looks like: dovecot-keywords: 0 $Forwarded 1 $MDNSent 2 $Label2 3 $Label1 file: Maildir/cur/1178712608.H529732P11686.yak.fluid.com:2,RSdc ...which matches, d=$Label1 (Important), c=$Label2 (Work) and TBird is displaying the email as having both tags - all is well and good. Now, his account looks like: dovecot-keywords: 0 Junk 1 NonJunk 2 $Label4 3 $Label1 4 $Label2 5 $Label3 6 $Label5 file:...
2012 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] We need better hashing
...from switching Constants.cpp to use it though (just so that any problems doesn't cause both to get reverted). > > OK. I'm still working on getting a consensus from the hashing experts :) My advise is to check in when you have to make forward progress. If people want to reshave your yak into another hairdo, then then can do that at some later time. No reason to block your progress as long as the API is good. Thanks again for working on this! -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attac...
2013 Feb 01
3
Cannot get puppetlabs-haproxy to do what I want
...eout client 1m timeout server 1m timeout check 10s server rabbit01 10.0.2.15:55672,10.0.2.15:5672 check listen messaging00 10.0.2.15:55672,10.0.2.15:5672 balance roundrobin mode tcp option tcplog option tcpka Any help would be GREATLY appreciated ... I''ve done much yak shaving to get this far and this is the last piece to give me the sweet setup I am looking for. :) Thanks, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send...
2012 Aug 23
1
Stale NFS file handle
Hi, I'm a bit curious of error messages of the type "remote operation failed: Stale NFS file handle". All clients using the file system use Gluster Native Client, so why should stale nfs file handle be reported? Regards, /jon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2019 Jun 26
0
Alternitives to Firefox...
...ly worse). > > Long story short.. there aren't any that work well. The web standards are constantly changing, and you end up with a web browser where all the pages look like crap through little fault of the browser. Most browser teams get burned out and realize they are better off shaving yaks for sweater wool. Other teams do some level of good enough but they also have to keep up with newer things which means that trying to run it on EL6 is not going to be something they want to add to their pile of crap. They also tend towards keeping up with the Joneses so their interfaces will look...
2003 Jun 24
3
[Bug 105] Connection tracking table full, no new connections accepted
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-06-24 20:00 ------- Did you try to enlarge your connection tracking table? (Pleae read the FAQ) Do the /proc/net/ip_conntrack entries look plausible, or are there lots of entries with unreasonably high timeout? ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------