Hello! Is it possible to make the sources a bit more portable? I'm on QNX4 with Watcom C v10.6B which has no support for int64. I'd like to be able to compile as many modules as do not depend on int64. (Currently I do not need SFTP that bad, the SSH is enough for me) -- Best regards, Anthony mailto:rz1a at mail.ru
Hello, list! Instead of reading about someone's signatures, may I ask again whether I have any chance to compile OpenSSH package with a toolchain lacking the int64 support (such as Watcom v10.6 on QNX4)? I'd like to be able to compile as many modules as do not depend on int64. (Currently I do not need SFTP that bad, the SSH is enough for me) -- Best regards, Anthony mailto:rz1a at mail.ru
Hello Darren,
Sunday, March 20, 2005, 1:20:45 PM, you wrote:
DT> Don't feel offended about the lack of response; half the team is
either
DT> away or otherwise occupied so we can't even discuss it yet.
:)
I was "offended" with that off-topic.
PS
I was asking to benchmark GMP v4.1.4 against BigNum from OpenSSL -
nearly all the tests were ~2~3 times quicker on GMP.
Will OpenSSH use GMP ever again?
--
Best regards,
Anthony
mailto:rz1a at nwgsm.ru