mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org
2001-Feb-12 16:23 UTC
openssh bugs in snapshot for nextstep (fwd)
I was sent this from Mark Miller. Should we be using MAXPATHLEN
instead of PATH_MAX in the upstream tree? Not all systems define
PATH_MAX.
- Ben
--- sftp-int.c.orig Sat Feb 10 13:56:08 2001
+++ sftp-int.c Sun Feb 11 23:33:26 2001
@@ -435,5 +435,5 @@
unsigned long n_arg;
Attrib a, *aa;
- char path_buf[PATH_MAX];
+ char path_buf[MAXPATHLEN];
path1 = path2 = NULL;
--
_/ mark miller
_/ markm at swoon.net
_/
_/ NeXTmail OK
Circa 2001-Feb-12 10:23:38 -0600 dixit mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org: : I was sent this from Mark Miller. Should we be using MAXPATHLEN : instead of PATH_MAX in the upstream tree? Not all systems define : PATH_MAX. Isn't MAXPATHLEN the BSD name for PATH_MAX? I would suggest rather something like: #ifndef PATH_MAX # ifndef MAXPATHLEN # define MAXPATHLEN <some-arbitrary-value> # endif # define PATH_MAX MAXPATHLEN #endif where <some-arbitrary-value> is, if possible, guessed from the operating system, or at the very least chosen intelligently. -- jim knoble | jmknoble at jmknoble.cx | http://www.jmknoble.cx/