bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-22 19:06 UTC
[Bug 3264] New: ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 Bug ID: 3264 Summary: ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster I noticed after making a typo in my ssh_config that if one sets the ForwardAgent option to a value other than yes or no, a socket is still created on the destination, but that socket does not respond. To test, I started `ssh-agent -d', set SSH_AUTH_SOCK, added a key, and ran these commands: % ssh -o ForwardAgent=yrs 10.0.0.1 ssh-add -l % ssh -o ForwardAgent=yes 10.0.0.1 ssh-add -l In both cases, the output is the same until the 'ssh-agent -l' command is run: OpenSSH_8.4p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1i 8 Dec 2020 ... debug1: Requesting authentication agent forwarding. ... debug1: Sending command: ssh-add -l debug1: client_input_channel_open: ctype auth-agent at openssh.com rchan 2 win 65536 max 16384 At this point, the output diverges. For ForwardAgent=yrs: debug1: client_request_agent: ssh_get_authentication_socket: No such file or directory debug1: failure auth-agent at openssh.com error fetching identities: communication with agent failed It can be seen that ssh-agent is not outputting debug information showing that it has received activity on the client machine's socket. For the correct ForwardAgent=yes: debug1: channel 1: new [authentication agent connection] debug1: confirm auth-agent at openssh.com debug2: fd 4 setting O_NONBLOCK debug1: process_message: socket 1 (fd=4) type 11 debug1: channel 1: FORCE input drain 2048 SHA256:4c82f66aac74743b56154b7a06b6b91297ece749326 /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (RSA) ... I am using OpenSSH 8.4p1 compiled against musl on Alpine Linux, should that make a difference. I do not believe there are any patches being applied that would have anything to do with this bug. Regards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-22 19:13 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 Sev <sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:06 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3217 CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- This behaviour is intentional as this option accepts arbitrary path names as argument:> ForwardAgent > Specifies whether the connection to the authentication agent (if > any) will be forwarded to the remote machine. The argument may > be yes, no (the default), an explicit path to an agent socket or > the name of an environment variable (beginning with ?$?) in which > to find the path.Though perhaps ssh should warn in cases that the specified agent socket does not exist Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3217 [Bug 3217] Tracking bug for 8.5 release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:07 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- OpenSSH 8.5 will warn in this case: [djm at tiresias ssh]$ ./ssh/obj/ssh -Snone -oForwardAgent=xxx hades Cannot forward agent socket path "xxx": No such file or directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:27 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 --- Comment #3 from Sev <sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster> ---> This behaviour is intentional as this option accepts arbitrary path > names as argumentI was sure to read ssh_config(5) but somehow I completely skipped over this usage. In hindsight the error and the man page make perfect sense.> OpenSSH 8.5 will warn in this caseGiven my situation, of course I agree that it's the right decision to make it more obvious. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Mar-03 22:52 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- close bugs that were resolved in OpenSSH 8.5 release cycle -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.