bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-22 19:06 UTC
[Bug 3264] New: ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264
Bug ID: 3264
Summary: ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes,
no)
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.4p1
Hardware: amd64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
Reporter: sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster
I noticed after making a typo in my ssh_config that if one sets the
ForwardAgent option to a value other than yes or no, a socket is still
created on the destination, but that socket does not respond.
To test, I started `ssh-agent -d', set SSH_AUTH_SOCK, added a key, and
ran these commands:
% ssh -o ForwardAgent=yrs 10.0.0.1 ssh-add -l
% ssh -o ForwardAgent=yes 10.0.0.1 ssh-add -l
In both cases, the output is the same until the 'ssh-agent -l' command
is run:
OpenSSH_8.4p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1i 8 Dec 2020
...
debug1: Requesting authentication agent forwarding.
...
debug1: Sending command: ssh-add -l
debug1: client_input_channel_open: ctype auth-agent at openssh.com
rchan 2 win 65536 max 16384
At this point, the output diverges. For ForwardAgent=yrs:
debug1: client_request_agent: ssh_get_authentication_socket: No
such file or directory
debug1: failure auth-agent at openssh.com
error fetching identities: communication with agent failed
It can be seen that ssh-agent is not outputting debug information
showing that it has received activity on the client machine's socket.
For the correct ForwardAgent=yes:
debug1: channel 1: new [authentication agent connection]
debug1: confirm auth-agent at openssh.com
debug2: fd 4 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: process_message: socket 1 (fd=4) type 11
debug1: channel 1: FORCE input drain
2048 SHA256:4c82f66aac74743b56154b7a06b6b91297ece749326
/home/user/.ssh/id_rsa (RSA)
...
I am using OpenSSH 8.4p1 compiled against musl on Alpine Linux, should
that make a difference. I do not believe there are any patches being
applied that would have anything to do with this bug.
Regards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-22 19:13 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264
Sev <sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:06 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |3217
CC| |djm at mindrot.org
--- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
This behaviour is intentional as this option accepts arbitrary path
names as argument:
> ForwardAgent
> Specifies whether the connection to the authentication agent (if
> any) will be forwarded to the remote machine. The argument may
> be yes, no (the default), an explicit path to an agent socket or
> the name of an environment variable (beginning with ?$?) in which
> to find the path.
Though perhaps ssh should warn in cases that the specified agent socket
does not exist
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3217
[Bug 3217] Tracking bug for 8.5 release
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:07 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
OpenSSH 8.5 will warn in this case:
[djm at tiresias ssh]$ ./ssh/obj/ssh -Snone -oForwardAgent=xxx hades
Cannot forward agent socket path "xxx": No such file or directory
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Feb-23 00:27 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264 --- Comment #3 from Sev <sev+ssh-bugs at sev.monster> ---> This behaviour is intentional as this option accepts arbitrary path > names as argumentI was sure to read ssh_config(5) but somehow I completely skipped over this usage. In hindsight the error and the man page make perfect sense.> OpenSSH 8.5 will warn in this caseGiven my situation, of course I agree that it's the right decision to make it more obvious. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2021-Mar-03 22:52 UTC
[Bug 3264] ForwardAgent inactive socket with values not in (yes, no)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3264
Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
close bugs that were resolved in OpenSSH 8.5 release cycle
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.