Lee Jones
2023-Mar-17 08:23 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH 34/37] drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102: Completely remove unused function ‘tu102_gr_load’
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c:210:1: warning: ?tu102_gr_load? defined but not used [-Wunused-function] Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c index 10a7e59482a6f..a7775aa185415 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c @@ -206,19 +206,6 @@ tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid(struct nvkm_blob *blob, struct gf100_gr_pack **ppack) return gk20a_gr_av_to_init_(blob, 64, 0x00100000, ppack); } -static int -tu102_gr_load(struct gf100_gr *gr, int ver, const struct gf100_gr_fwif *fwif) -{ - int ret; - - ret = gm200_gr_load(gr, ver, fwif); - if (ret) - return ret; - - return gk20a_gr_load_net(gr, "gr/", "sw_veid_bundle_init", ver, tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid, - &gr->bundle_veid); -} - static const struct gf100_gr_fwif tu102_gr_fwif[] = { { 0, gm200_gr_load, &tu102_gr, &gp108_gr_fecs_acr, &gp108_gr_gpccs_acr }, -- 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
Karol Herbst
2023-Mar-17 14:13 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH 34/37] drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102: Completely remove unused function ‘tu102_gr_load’
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:23?AM Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> wrote:> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c:210:1: warning: ?tu102_gr_load? defined but not used [-Wunused-function] >mhh, this looks a little fishy and might be a mistake not using this function. Ben, is it safe to remove it? The code seems to be slightly different things, but also looks like it needs to be rewritten a little anyway.> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c | 13 ------------- > 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c > index 10a7e59482a6f..a7775aa185415 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102.c > @@ -206,19 +206,6 @@ tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid(struct nvkm_blob *blob, struct gf100_gr_pack **ppack) > return gk20a_gr_av_to_init_(blob, 64, 0x00100000, ppack); > } > > -static int > -tu102_gr_load(struct gf100_gr *gr, int ver, const struct gf100_gr_fwif *fwif) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = gm200_gr_load(gr, ver, fwif); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > - return gk20a_gr_load_net(gr, "gr/", "sw_veid_bundle_init", ver, tu102_gr_av_to_init_veid, > - &gr->bundle_veid); > -} > - > static const struct gf100_gr_fwif > tu102_gr_fwif[] = { > { 0, gm200_gr_load, &tu102_gr, &gp108_gr_fecs_acr, &gp108_gr_gpccs_acr }, > -- > 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog >
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/tu102: remove unused tu102_gr_load function
- [PATCH 34/37] drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102: Completely remove unused function ‘tu102_gr_load’
- [PATCH] [RESEND] drm/nouveau: remove unused tu102_gr_load() function
- [RESEND 00/15] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU
- [RESEND 10/15] drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/tu102: Staticify local function gf100_fifo_nonstall_block()