Nouveau - Mar 2021 - [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at
vmware.com>
> > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure
what
> > > > happened here.
> > > 
> > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a
reason.
> > > 
> > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back
out of
> > > a previous one.
> > 
> > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next
merge
> > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure
they
> > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so
patches
> > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > 
> > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to
some
> > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again
(they
> > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> > 
> > Sorry for the confusion here.
> 
> Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
> 
> Thanks for the explanation Daniel
After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
please?

-- 
Lee Jones [???]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org ? Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at
vmware.com>
> > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not
sure what
> > > > > happened here.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a
reason.
> > > >
> > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them
back out of
> > > > a previous one.
> > >
> > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for
next merge
> > > window even during the current merge window, but need to make
sure they
> > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong
so patches
> > > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due
to some
> > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next
again (they
> > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> > >
> > > Sorry for the confusion here.
> >
> > Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be
happy.
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation Daniel
>
> After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
> someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
> please?
It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again,
they're also on this thread.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch