On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > >
> > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at
vmware.com>
> > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure
what
> > > > happened here.
> > >
> > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a
reason.
> > >
> > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back
out of
> > > a previous one.
> >
> > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next
merge
> > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure
they
> > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so
patches
> > show up, and then get pulled again.
> >
> > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to
some
> > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again
(they
> > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion here.
>
> Oh, I see. Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
>
> Thanks for the explanation Daniel
After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained. Would
someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
please?
--
Lee Jones [???]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org ? Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog