Daniel Vetter
2020-Aug-02 18:18 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move function shoudn't exist anymore with atomic: With atomic the bo pinning and actual modeset commit is completely separated in the code patsh. This annotation was originally added in commit 060810d7abaabcab282e062c595871d661561400 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Mon Jul 8 14:15:51 2013 +1000 drm/nouveau: fix locking issues in page flipping paths due to commit b580c9e2b7ba5030a795aa2fb73b796523d65a78 Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> Date: Thu Jun 27 13:48:18 2013 +0200 drm/nouveau: make flipping lockdep safe Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org --- I might be totally wrong, so this definitely needs testing :-) Cheers, Daniel --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 7806278dce57..a7b2a9bb0ffe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, int evict, bool intr, return ret; } - mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(drm->dev)) + mutex_lock(&cli->mutex); + else + mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + ret = nouveau_fence_sync(nouveau_bo(bo), chan, true, intr); if (ret == 0) { ret = drm->ttm.move(chan, bo, &bo->mem, new_reg); -- 2.27.0
Maarten Lankhorst
2020-Aug-03 11:22 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
Op 02-08-2020 om 20:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:> Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the > legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move function > shoudn't exist anymore with atomic: With atomic the bo pinning and > actual modeset commit is completely separated in the code patsh. > > This annotation was originally added in > > commit 060810d7abaabcab282e062c595871d661561400 > Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Date: Mon Jul 8 14:15:51 2013 +1000 > > drm/nouveau: fix locking issues in page flipping paths > > due to > > commit b580c9e2b7ba5030a795aa2fb73b796523d65a78 > Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> > Date: Thu Jun 27 13:48:18 2013 +0200 > > drm/nouveau: make flipping lockdep safe > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > --- > I might be totally wrong, so this definitely needs testing :-) > > Cheers, Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > index 7806278dce57..a7b2a9bb0ffe 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, int evict, bool intr, > return ret; > } > > - mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(drm->dev)) > + mutex_lock(&cli->mutex); > + else > + mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > + > ret = nouveau_fence_sync(nouveau_bo(bo), chan, true, intr); > if (ret == 0) { > ret = drm->ttm.move(chan, bo, &bo->mem, new_reg);Well if you're certain it works now. :) Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Daniel Vetter
2020-Sep-17 13:15 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
Ben, did you have a chance to look at this? -Daniel On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:22 PM Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com> wrote:> > Op 02-08-2020 om 20:18 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the > > legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move function > > shoudn't exist anymore with atomic: With atomic the bo pinning and > > actual modeset commit is completely separated in the code patsh. > > > > This annotation was originally added in > > > > commit 060810d7abaabcab282e062c595871d661561400 > > Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > Date: Mon Jul 8 14:15:51 2013 +1000 > > > > drm/nouveau: fix locking issues in page flipping paths > > > > due to > > > > commit b580c9e2b7ba5030a795aa2fb73b796523d65a78 > > Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> > > Date: Thu Jun 27 13:48:18 2013 +0200 > > > > drm/nouveau: make flipping lockdep safe > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> > > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > > --- > > I might be totally wrong, so this definitely needs testing :-) > > > > Cheers, Daniel > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > > index 7806278dce57..a7b2a9bb0ffe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > > @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, int evict, bool intr, > > return ret; > > } > > > > - mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > > + if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(drm->dev)) > > + mutex_lock(&cli->mutex); > > + else > > + mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > > + > > ret = nouveau_fence_sync(nouveau_bo(bo), chan, true, intr); > > if (ret == 0) { > > ret = drm->ttm.move(chan, bo, &bo->mem, new_reg); > > Well if you're certain it works now. :) > > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com> >-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic