Maarten Lankhorst
2013-Feb-19  10:20 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix suspend bug in nvc0 fence implementation
Everywhere else the constant is multiplied by 16/4, so it looks like
nvc0_fence_suspend/resume is buggy here.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org [3.7+]
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c
index 85a0e78..4f46d8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c
@@ -161,11 +161,12 @@ nvc0_fence_suspend(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
 	struct nouveau_fifo *pfifo = nouveau_fifo(drm->device);
 	struct nvc0_fence_priv *priv = drm->fence;
 	int i;
+	u32 chan = pfifo->max + 1;
-	priv->suspend = vmalloc((pfifo->max + 1) * sizeof(u32));
+	priv->suspend = vmalloc(chan * sizeof(u32));
 	if (priv->suspend) {
-		for (i = 0; i <= pfifo->max; i++)
-			priv->suspend[i] = nouveau_bo_rd32(priv->bo, i);
+		for (i = 0; i < chan; i++)
+			priv->suspend[i] = nouveau_bo_rd32(priv->bo, i * 16/4);
 	}
 	return priv->suspend != NULL;
@@ -177,10 +178,11 @@ nvc0_fence_resume(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
 	struct nouveau_fifo *pfifo = nouveau_fifo(drm->device);
 	struct nvc0_fence_priv *priv = drm->fence;
 	int i;
+	u32 chan = pfifo->max + 1;
 	if (priv->suspend) {
-		for (i = 0; i <= pfifo->max; i++)
-			nouveau_bo_wr32(priv->bo, i, priv->suspend[i]);
+		for (i = 0; i < chan; i++)
+			nouveau_bo_wr32(priv->bo, i * 16/4, priv->suspend[i]);
 		vfree(priv->suspend);
 		priv->suspend = NULL;
 	}
Marcin Slusarz
2013-Feb-19  19:49 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix suspend bug in nvc0 fence implementation
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:20:55AM +0000, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:> Everywhere else the constant is multiplied by 16/4, so it looks like > nvc0_fence_suspend/resume is buggy here. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst at gmail.com> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org [3.7+]Yay. It will probably fix https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59168. (note: it doesn't apply on top of nouveau/master) Reviewed-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com>> --- > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c > index 85a0e78..4f46d8b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvc0_fence.c > @@ -161,11 +161,12 @@ nvc0_fence_suspend(struct nouveau_drm *drm) > struct nouveau_fifo *pfifo = nouveau_fifo(drm->device); > struct nvc0_fence_priv *priv = drm->fence; > int i; > + u32 chan = pfifo->max + 1; > > - priv->suspend = vmalloc((pfifo->max + 1) * sizeof(u32)); > + priv->suspend = vmalloc(chan * sizeof(u32)); > if (priv->suspend) { > - for (i = 0; i <= pfifo->max; i++) > - priv->suspend[i] = nouveau_bo_rd32(priv->bo, i); > + for (i = 0; i < chan; i++) > + priv->suspend[i] = nouveau_bo_rd32(priv->bo, i * 16/4); > } > > return priv->suspend != NULL; > @@ -177,10 +178,11 @@ nvc0_fence_resume(struct nouveau_drm *drm) > struct nouveau_fifo *pfifo = nouveau_fifo(drm->device); > struct nvc0_fence_priv *priv = drm->fence; > int i; > + u32 chan = pfifo->max + 1; > > if (priv->suspend) { > - for (i = 0; i <= pfifo->max; i++) > - nouveau_bo_wr32(priv->bo, i, priv->suspend[i]); > + for (i = 0; i < chan; i++) > + nouveau_bo_wr32(priv->bo, i * 16/4, priv->suspend[i]); > vfree(priv->suspend); > priv->suspend = NULL; > }
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau: unpin various bo's before destroying
- [PATCH 0/4] Some initial tidy-ups and refactoring
- [Patch] reenable fifos if we get an error while fifos disabled
- [RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: split off nvc0 compilation
- RESEND NVA3 clock tree improvements