Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the mailing list. Does anyone know why that header is not included ? I consider it a must have for any mailing list, without reply-to it's quite impractical. Or is everyone used to use reply-all or something, which includes the ML in CC, and no one does the same mistake than me ? Maybe the problem is just me, as I only used mailing lists that filled reply-to correctly before.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Xavier wrote:> Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button > in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the > mailing list. > Does anyone know why that header is not included ? > I consider it a must have for any mailing list, without reply-to it's > quite impractical.and what about people who are not subscribed? with "reply-to" header would "reply" still cc them?> Or is everyone used to use reply-all or something, which includes the > ML in CC, and no one does the same mistake than me ?i always reply-to-all, because...> Maybe the problem is just me, as I only used mailing lists that filled > reply-to correctly before.... I have an opposite experience, but maybe it's just me ;)
On 2009.12.30 14:00, Xavier wrote:> Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button > in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the > mailing list. > Does anyone know why that header is not included ? > I consider it a must have for any mailing list, without reply-to it's > quite impractical. > Or is everyone used to use reply-all or something, which includes the > ML in CC, and no one does the same mistake than me ? > Maybe the problem is just me, as I only used mailing lists that > filled reply-to correctly before.I don't think it's just you... I believe some mailing list software has the option so the default "reply" goes either to the list of the original sender. This could be checked by the list admin. Also - some mail clients (I use Balsa) have a "Reply to group" (in my case, just hitting "g" instead of "r") which seems to do the right thing here.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 23847] New: kernel BUG when using nouveau
- [Bug 20612] New: nouveau xv crash with BadMatch ( invalid parameter attributes)
- [Bug 24271] New: PGRAPH_ERROR , often after suspend/resume
- [PATCH] drm: Generalized NV Block Linear DRM format mod
- Balsa for CentOS ??