bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2017-Jun-29 02:21 UTC
[Bug 1160] New: dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160 Bug ID: 1160 Summary: dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: zing at fastmail.fm I've a got a dnat rule inserted like this: # nft add rule tcpproxy preproxy tcp dport 500 meta mark set 0x1 dnat to 107.14.73.68:25 However, when I list it the dnat ip address is not shown (only the port): # nft list chain tcpproxy preproxy table ip tcpproxy { chain preproxy { type nat hook prerouting priority -150; policy accept; tcp dport isakmp mark set 0x00000001 dnat to :smtp } } It seems to work ok, but you can't find out what the rule actually once it's inserted. # nft --version nftables v0.7 (Scrooge McDuck) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20170629/efabb4d4/attachment.html>
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2017-Jul-07 10:55 UTC
[Bug 1160] dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- Fixed upstream, thanks for reporting. We're releasing nft 0.8 soon containing a bugfix for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20170707/3e0e4ba8/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 1329] New: flush set not working: "Could not process rule: Invalid argument"
- [Bug 1168] New: type nat hook output doesn't work anymore
- [Bug 1187] New: SIGABRT: "BUG: unknown expression type prefix"
- [Bug 1233] New: Problem with import of small iptables rule sets with multiport match
- [Bug 1155] New: arp forward filter doesn't work