bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2013-Jul-09 19:48 UTC
[Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616 --- Comment #11 from - <kd6lvw at yahoo.com> 2013-07-09 21:48:05 CEST --- I fully disagree that the addition of duplicate rules that will never be reached is part of the design. As a waste of memory allocation, it is inefficient and therefore incorrect. The use of a hostname in place of an IP address literal should not have any effect in the rule(s) generated. It doesn't matter that there are three addresses. After applying the mask, there is only one unique address, and therefore, there should be only one rule. If IPtables behaved this way "since the beginning of time," then explain to me why ip6tables' behavior originally differed. Your argument lacks candor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 616] New: Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.
- [Bug 616] Duplicate rules for multi-homed hostnames. IPv4 and IPv6 inconsistent treatment.