bugzilla-daemon@netfilter.org
2003-Aug-19 10:25 UTC
[Bug 108] strange text response for illegal ipv6 ip numbers in rules
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp 2003-07-04 08:35 ------- Created an attachment (id=30) a bit of miss, so I don't mail to netfilter-devel ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-08-19 12:25 ------- I cannot reproduce the problem with either iptables-1.2.7a, 1.2.8 or current CVS. Can you please give a more detailed description? I correctly receive an error message: naboo:/etc/uucp# ip6tables -D OUTPUT -s 2001:300:::/48 -j ACCEPT ip6tables v1.2.8: host/network `2001:300:::' not found Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables-1.2.9
- [ANNOUNCE] Release of iptables-1.2.8
- [ADMINISTRATIVE] bugzilla.netfilter.org running again
- [Bug 567] New: Local multicast ICMPv6 and --state INVALID
- [Bug 474] New: nf_conntrack marks all packets as INVALID on sparc64 (probably endianness bug)