jan julian
2009-Apr-30 18:43 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.6.7.1 checksum_type setting verification
We have compiled lustre with --disable checksum as a performance enhancement on 1.6.7.1 and would like to verify that this is actually in affect. Reviewing /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/checksum_type we see two responses across all of the test system nodes mtg[1-2],mtn1sm,mtt[1-2] ---------------- crc32 [adler] crc32 [adler] crc32 [adler] crc32 [adler] crc32 [adler] crc32 [adler] ---------------- mtmds1 ---------------- [crc32] [crc32] [crc32] [crc32] [crc32] [crc32] Is this an indication that the checksum is running? Is there a way to verify directly that checksum is disabled or not?
Johann Lombardi
2009-Apr-30 19:51 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.6.7.1 checksum_type setting verification
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:43 PM, jan julian wrote:> We have compiled lustre with --disable checksum as a performance > enhancement on 1.6.7.1 and would like to verify that this is actually > in affect. Reviewing /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/checksum_typeYou should check /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/chechsums instead of checksum_type (lctl get_param osc.*.checksums). If it is set to 0, it means that check-summing is disabled. Johann
jan julian
2009-Apr-30 20:18 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.6.7.1 checksum_type setting verification
Thanks Johann They show up in /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/checksums as off. Jan On Apr 30, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Johann Lombardi wrote:> On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:43 PM, jan julian wrote: >> We have compiled lustre with --disable checksum as a performance >> enhancement on 1.6.7.1 and would like to verify that this is >> actually >> in affect. Reviewing /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/checksum_type > > You should check /proc/fs/lustre/osc/*/chechsums instead of > checksum_type > (lctl get_param osc.*.checksums). If it is set to 0, it means that > check-summing > is disabled. > > Johann