Patrick Winnertz
2008-Mar-20 08:55 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Download Problems with lustre 1.6.4.3
Hello, I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of lustre from [1], but it failed with this error: An error occurred while processing your request. Reference #50.663007d9.1206002944.16ba5fe1 Does anybody have some hints how to get the lustre source code then? I need this tarball for the debian packaging. If someone could point me to an alternative download possibility, I would be glad. Thanks in advance Patrick Winnertz [1]: http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp -- Patrick Winnertz Tel.: +49 (0) 2161 / 4643 - 0 Spamtrap: winnie at qsc218.credativ.com credativ GmbH, HRB M?nchengladbach 12080 Hohenzollernstr. 133, 41061 M?nchengladbach Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Dr. Michael Meskes, J?rg Folz
Hello! On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote:> I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of > lustre from > [1], but it failed with this error:Please try http://downloads.lustre.org This is new downloads site that went onto comission just yesterday, so no wide announcements were made yet, it seems. Bye, Oleg
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Oleg Drokin <Oleg.Drokin at sun.com> wrote:> Hello! > > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of > > lustre from > > [1], but it failed with this error: > > Please try http://downloads.lustre.org > This is new downloads site that went onto comission just yesterday, so > no wide announcements were made yet, it seems.I''ve been attempting to convince sun that their download website sucks and they need to change it, I could paste the entire email thread but that would be cruel, to you guys. Could the wiki.lustre.org download link get changed to the downloads.lustre.org location? Thanks, - David Brown
Michael Sternberg
2008-Mar-21 03:10 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Download Problems with lustre 1.6.4.3
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Oleg Drokin <Oleg.Drokin at > sun.com> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > > I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of > > > lustre from > > > [1], but it failed with this error: > > > > Please try http://downloads.lustre.org > > This is new downloads site that went onto comission just > yesterday, so > > no wide announcements were made yet, it seems. > > I''ve been attempting to convince sun that their download website sucks > and they need to change it, I could paste the entire email thread but > that would be cruel, to you guys.I had the *very same* experience, receiving from SDLC talk about firewall settings etc., culminating in an off-topic and canned referral to the Java development community -- very frustrating. I found the RPMs I was seeking at the download site Oleg mentioned. Feels like arriving at an oasis of sanity. -- Thank you very much! Regards, Michael
> I had the *very same* experience, receiving from SDLC talk about > firewall settings etc., culminating in an off-topic and canned > referral to the Java development community -- very frustrating. > I found the RPMs I was seeking at the download site Oleg mentioned. > Feels like arriving at an oasis of sanity. -- Thank you very much! >If there has been more issues than just mine and if you''ve brought the download issue up with SDLC. I''d like to know a few things from you if you could (this goes to anyone having issues). 1) location in the world or internet. 2) when you tried to download. 3) if you have some SDLC reference number that I can pass on to the people I''m talking to so they can see there''s a more wide spread issue here (Sun being stupid? ;). The more data we can throw at them complaining about this hopefully they''ll get the picture that it sucks and they need to fix it. Thanks, - David Brown
...OK, so should there be anything here? The directory seems empty, or possibly the files have incorrect permissions set, or we changed our minds :-/ http://downloads.lustre.org/public/lustre/v1.6/ -frank On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 05:46 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:> Hello! > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of > > lustre from > > [1], but it failed with this error: > > Please try http://downloads.lustre.org > This is new downloads site that went onto comission just yesterday, so > no wide announcements were made yet, it seems. > > Bye, > Oleg > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
Michael Sternberg
2008-Apr-19 04:39 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Download Problems with lustre 1.6.4.3
I had success the other day at Sun''s official download site - looks like the issues it had are fixed. Regards, Michael On Apr 16, 2008, at 14:28 , Frank Leers wrote:> ...OK, so should there be anything here? The directory seems empty, > or > possibly the files have incorrect permissions set, or we changed our > minds :-/ > > http://downloads.lustre.org/public/lustre/v1.6/ > > -frank > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 05:46 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: >> Hello! >> >> On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote: >>> I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of >>> lustre from >>> [1], but it failed with this error: >> >> Please try http://downloads.lustre.org >> This is new downloads site that went onto comission just yesterday, >> so >> no wide announcements were made yet, it seems. >> >> Bye, >> Oleg
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Michael Sternberg <sternberg at anl.gov> wrote:> I had success the other day at Sun''s official download site - looks > like the issues it had are fixed.Except the download site shows a newer RHEL kernel, which may fix the performance issues Lustre patches introduced into the RHEL 2.6.9-67.0.4 kernel: http://downloads.lustre.org/public/kernels/rhel4/linux-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.tar.bz2 ...and OFED 1.3: http://downloads.lustre.org/public/OFED/OFED-1.3.tgz So, it looks like something is available past 1.6.4.3 but is not available on the download site or the SUN site. Chris> > > Regards, Michael > > > > > On Apr 16, 2008, at 14:28 , Frank Leers wrote: > > ...OK, so should there be anything here? The directory seems empty, > > or > > possibly the files have incorrect permissions set, or we changed our > > minds :-/ > > > > http://downloads.lustre.org/public/lustre/v1.6/ > > > > -frank > > > > On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 05:46 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > >> Hello! > >> > >> On Mar 20, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > >>> I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of > >>> lustre from > >>> [1], but it failed with this error: > >> > >> Please try http://downloads.lustre.org > >> This is new downloads site that went onto comission just yesterday, > >> so > >> no wide announcements were made yet, it seems. > >> > >> Bye, > >> Oleg > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >