Vicente Bergas via llvm-dev
2021-Dec-20 16:03 UTC
[llvm-dev] How to force address of symbol
Hello,
i would like to force the address of the symbol "start" which is a
function.
(there is also the use case where the symbol of interest is a data array)
The symbol is declared in file test.c:
__asm__ (
" .section .test \n"
" .global start \n"
" .syntax unified \n"
" .thumb \n"
" .thumb_func \n"
" .type start, %function \n"
"start: \n"
" ldr r0, stack_addr \n"
" mov sp, r0 \n"
" b reset \n"
" .align 2 \n"
"stack_addr: \n"
" .word stack \n"
);
void reset(void) { while (1); }
and compiled this way:
clang --target=armv6-m -mfloat-abi=soft -c test.c -o test.o
or
${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc -c test.c -o test.o
When linking i am using the script file link.ld:
MEMORY { RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x1000, LENGTH = 0x1000 }
ENTRY(start)
SECTIONS {
.text : { *(.test) } > RAM
stack = ORIGIN(RAM) + LENGTH(RAM);
}
and linked this way:
ld.lld -T link.ld test.o --gc-sections -o test.elf
or
${CROSS_COMPILE}ld -T link.ld test.o --gc-sections -o test.elf
In the llvm case, there is a warning reported:
ld.lld: warning: test.c:(.test+0x4): has non-ABS relocation
R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 against symbol 'reset'
but it succeeds.
Finally, i check that the "start" symbol is placed at the correct
address with:
llvm-objdump --syms test.elf
or
${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --syms test.elf
The result is wrong for the llvm case (address is zero) and correct
for the gnu case (address is 0x1000).
Am i doing something wrong?
Is this difference between gnu and llvm expected or is it a bug?
LLVM/CLANG version: 13.0.0 (https://archlinux.org/)
GCC version: 11.2.1 (http://musl.cc/)
LD version: 2.37 (http://musl.cc/)
Regards,
Vicenç.
Jessica Clarke via llvm-dev
2021-Dec-22 20:53 UTC
[llvm-dev] How to force address of symbol
On 20 Dec 2021, at 16:03, Vicente Bergas via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Hello, > i would like to force the address of the symbol "start" which is a function. > (there is also the use case where the symbol of interest is a data array) > The symbol is declared in file test.c: > __asm__ ( > " .section .test \n" > " .global start \n" > " .syntax unified \n" > " .thumb \n" > " .thumb_func \n" > " .type start, %function \n" > "start: \n" > " ldr r0, stack_addr \n" > " mov sp, r0 \n" > " b reset \n" > " .align 2 \n" > "stack_addr: \n" > " .word stack \n" > ); > void reset(void) { while (1); } > > and compiled this way: > clang --target=armv6-m -mfloat-abi=soft -c test.c -o test.o > or > ${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc -c test.c -o test.o > > When linking i am using the script file link.ld: > MEMORY { RAM (rwx) : ORIGIN = 0x1000, LENGTH = 0x1000 } > ENTRY(start) > SECTIONS { > .text : { *(.test) } > RAM > stack = ORIGIN(RAM) + LENGTH(RAM); > } > > and linked this way: > ld.lld -T link.ld test.o --gc-sections -o test.elf > or > ${CROSS_COMPILE}ld -T link.ld test.o --gc-sections -o test.elf > > In the llvm case, there is a warning reported: > ld.lld: warning: test.c:(.test+0x4): has non-ABS relocation > R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 against symbol 'reset' > but it succeeds. > > Finally, i check that the "start" symbol is placed at the correct address with: > llvm-objdump --syms test.elf > or > ${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --syms test.elf > > The result is wrong for the llvm case (address is zero) and correct > for the gnu case (address is 0x1000). > > Am i doing something wrong? > Is this difference between gnu and llvm expected or is it a bug? > > LLVM/CLANG version: 13.0.0 (https://archlinux.org/) > GCC version: 11.2.1 (http://musl.cc/) > LD version: 2.37 (http://musl.cc/)You need to set the flags for .test in your .section directive; currently it ends up with no flags when using LLVM’s integrated assembler, and so isn’t an SHF_ALLOC section. You want “ax”, and should probably also be providing %progbits for good measure, i.e.: .section .test, "ax", %progbits Jess