Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-19 06:33 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. -Tom
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-19 13:01 UTC
[llvm-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Windows is ready: $ sha256sum LLVM-11.0.1-rc2*.exe af041a8cea522c57d8c89791c33c82986830b3db41e6c787cc811e795eec73d0 LLVM-11.0.1-rc2-win32.exe 5cd6c5ebaba1721150feba2917d23ff4653d0b63ea8eecd0885154e2f1bb9ca5 LLVM-11.0.1-rc2-win64.exe On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:33 AM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Uploaded Ubuntu 20.10.
sha256sum clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-20.10.tar.xz
fe243c575c7d90f6019be55c9aa56e2d8f3d398ef5410d4dc9b71ed0603cd809
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/memstats.c:60:10:
fatal error: 'sys/sysctl.h' file not found
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have a sysctl.h here.
/usr/include/linux/sysctl.h
FAIL: Profile-x86_64 :: Posix/gcov-fork.c (66166 of 71984)
******************** TEST 'Profile-x86_64 :: Posix/gcov-fork.c' FAILED
********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 8'; mkdir -p
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-11.0.1-rc2.obj/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Profile-x86_64/Posix/Output/gcov-fork.c.tmp.d
&& cd
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-11.0.1-rc2.obj/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Profile-x86_64/Posix/Output/gcov-fork.c.tmp.d
: 'RUN: at line 9';
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-11.0.1-rc2.obj/./bin/clang
-m64 -ldl --coverage
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/profile/Posix/gcov-fork.c
-o
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-11.0.1-rc2.obj/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Profile-x86_64/Posix/Output/gcov-fork.c.tmp
: 'RUN: at line 10'; test -f gcov-fork.gcno
: 'RUN: at line 12'; rm -f gcov-fork.gcda &&
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-11.0.1-rc2.obj/projects/compiler-rt/test/profile/Profile-x86_64/Posix/Output/gcov-fork.c.tmp
: 'RUN: at line 13'; llvm-cov gcov -t gcov-fork.gcda | FileCheck
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/profile/Posix/gcov-fork.c
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/profile/Posix/gcov-fork.c:18:32:
error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input
void func2() {} // CHECK-NEXT: 2: [[#@LINE]]:
^
<stdin>:22:21: note: scanning from here
1: 17:void func1() {} // CHECK: 1: [[#@LINE]]:void func1()
^
<stdin>:22:21: note: with "@LINE" equal to "18"
1: 17:void func1() {} // CHECK: 1: [[#@LINE]]:void func1()
^
<stdin>:23:39: note: possible intended match here
1: 18:void func2() {} // CHECK-NEXT: 2: [[#@LINE]]:
^
Input file: <stdin>
Check file:
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/profile/Posix/gcov-fork.c
-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.
Input was:
<<<<<<
.
.
.
17: -: 12:// RUN: rm -f gcov-fork.gcda && %run %t
18: -: 13:// RUN: llvm-cov gcov -t gcov-fork.gcda | FileCheck %s
19: -: 14:
20: -: 15:#include <unistd.h>
21: -: 16:
22: 1: 17:void func1() {} // CHECK: 1: [[#@LINE]]:void func1()
next:18'0 X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
23: 1: 18:void func2() {} // CHECK-NEXT: 2: [[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
next:18'1 ? possible intended match
24: 1: 19:int main(void) { // CHECK-NEXT: 1: [[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
25: 1: 20: func1(); // CHECK-NEXT: 1: [[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
26: 1: 21: if (fork() == -1) return 1; // CHECK-NEXT: 1:
[[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
27: 1: 22: func2(); // CHECK-NEXT: 2: [[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
28: 1: 23: return 0; // CHECK-NEXT: 2: [[#@LINE]]:
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
29: 1: 24:}
next:18'0 ~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
--
********************
Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90
FAIL: SanitizerCommon-Unit ::
./Sanitizer-x86_64-Test/SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize (66433 of 71984)
******************** TEST 'SanitizerCommon-Unit ::
./Sanitizer-x86_64-Test/SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize' FAILED
********************
Note: Google Test filter = SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerLinux
[ RUN ] SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/tests/sanitizer_linux_test.cpp:222:
Failure
Expected: (uptr)result
Which is: 2496
To be equal to: ThreadDescriptorSize()
Which is: 2304
[ FAILED ] SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize (0 ms)
[----------] 1 test from SanitizerLinux (0 ms total)
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (0 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
[ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below:
[ FAILED ] SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize
1 FAILED TEST
********************
Testing: 0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
********************
Failed Tests (2):
Profile-x86_64 :: Posix/gcov-fork.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit ::
./Sanitizer-x86_64-Test/SanitizerLinux.ThreadDescriptorSize
Testing Time: 355.58s
Unsupported : 1766
Passed : 69967
Expectedly Failed: 249
Failed : 2
tail testing.11.0.1-rc2.log
make[2]: Target 'CMakeFiles/check.dir/all' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/test-suite-build'
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:14713: CMakeFiles/check.dir/rule] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/test-suite-build'
make: *** [Makefile:165: check] Error 2
[Release+Asserts Phase3] test suite failed
llvm-test-suit
/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/llvm-test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/memstats.c:60:10:
fatal error: 'sys/sysctl.h' file not found
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
make[2]: ***
[MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CMakeFiles/CLAMR.dir/build.make:362:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CMakeFiles/CLAMR.dir/memstats.c.o]
Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:33683:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CMakeFiles/CLAMR.dir/all]
Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [Makefile:130: all] Error 2
llvm-test-suit ended with
[ 38%] Built target gcc-loops
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/nnelson/Documents/llvm-project/llvm/utils/release/rc2/test-suite-build'
Brian Cain suggested I use -lldb in the test-release.sh command. That
run obtained 44 lldb errors that I will provide in a bug.
I do not mind running this testing a number of times as you make
changes. Let me know.
Neil Nelson
On 12/18/20 11:33 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:> Hi,
>
> I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last
> release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.
>
> -Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201219/884115c4/attachment.html>
Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-21 09:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On 19 Dec 2020, at 07:33, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.For 11.0.1 rc2, I have built and tested on both FreeBSD 11 and 12 this time. No additional patches were needed. Main results on amd64-freebsd11: Unsupported : 5122 (11.0.1 rc1: 5122) Passed : 69796 (11.0.1 rc1: 69779) Expectedly Failed : 246 (11.0.1 rc1: 245) Timed Out : 16 (11.0.1 rc1: 16) Failed : 480 (11.0.1 rc1: 478) Unexpectedly Passed: 2 (11.0.1 rc1: 2) Test suite results on amd64-freebsd11: Passed: 2399 (11.0.1 rc1: 2400) Failed: 3 (11.0.1 rc1: 2) Main results on amd64-freebsd12: Unsupported : 5122 (11.0.1 rc1: 5122) Passed : 69793 (11.0.1 rc1: 69776) Expectedly Failed : 246 (11.0.1 rc1: 245) Timed Out : 16 (11.0.1 rc1: 16) Failed : 483 (11.0.1 rc1: 481) Unexpectedly Passed: 2 (11.0.1 rc1: 2) Test suite results on amd64-freebsd12: Passed: 2399 (11.0.1 rc1: 2399) Failed: 3 (11.0.1 rc1: 3) Main results on i386-freebsd11: Unsupported : 3513 (11.0.1 rc1: 3513) Passed : 66675 (11.0.1 rc1: 66654) Expectedly Failed : 231 (11.0.1 rc1: 230) Timed Out : 7 (11.0.1 rc1: 7) Failed : 317 (11.0.1 rc1: 319) Unexpectedly Passed: 1 (11.0.1 rc1: 1) Main results on i386-freebsd12: Unsupported : 3513 (11.0.1 rc1: 3513) Passed : 66670 (11.0.1 rc1: 66651) Expectedly Failed : 231 (11.0.1 rc1: 230) Timed Out : 7 (11.0.1 rc1: 7) Failed : 322 (11.0.1 rc1: 322) Unexpectedly Passed: 1 (11.0.1 rc1: 1) Uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = 8063ba2616492e060820b6859fe69c9f7ae9ea9b0307568635d816fbf2070722 SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd12.tar.xz) = f72e46f4f18e133a527fc120b78c928277b36eb60a40bf71717a6c952ec0fe11 SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd11.tar.xz) = b4c753772180be3ba3603de3b763626d975c6e834109af759b9df2a0ecf064ff SHA256 (clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd12.tar.xz) = 22513d2e02a527531d4886cc9c612f85e63bdc987e9b28aa127cb74b7ae2f37f -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 223 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201221/a9e12724/attachment.sig>
Michał Górny via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-21 19:51 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 22:33 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:> Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries.Gentoo amd64 looks good-ish, except that: 1) compiler-rt LSAN seems entirely broken, ThreadDescriptorSize tests fail too -- I guess once again glibc upgrade broke it. 2) LLDB tests are broken as usual -- but I'm finally starting to work on them. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-23 17:18 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Uploaded Ubuntu 16 and SLES12: d2cdda0d8b1f4fe44eb8a7751e488b5601d820dc260e81c73b05b5725ea4ca6a clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz da035f77cf043fc0c31842b0e54c1c47d893895ac109b261c6d91ea8aeccabc1 clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:33 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >-- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201223/6b6e8052/attachment.html>
Ahsan Saghir via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-23 23:40 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi, I finished testing llvm-11.0.1-rc2 on Power PC 64-bit Little Endian for - Ubuntu 18.04 - Red Hat 7.4 I have uploaded the binaries from IBM. The sha1 files are attached. Thanks, Ahsan Saghir. On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 01:33, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201223/d872c49b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-powerpc64le-linux-rhel-7.4.sha1 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 98 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201223/d872c49b/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-powerpc64le-linux-ubuntu-18.04.sha1 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 102 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201223/d872c49b/attachment-0001.obj>
Tobias Hieta via llvm-dev
2020-Dec-29 08:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Tom, macOS build are up: 94870578245312ad8b58209d11fbaa338053f9bf5d9ac3e6c57b4b1eff771c7f clang+llvm-11.0.1-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz Same two tests fail that has failed since a very long time: FAIL: libunwind :: libunwind_01.pass.cpp (69275 of 69321) FAIL: libunwind :: signal_frame.pass.cpp (69279 of 69321) On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:33 AM Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2021-Jan-05 03:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On 12/21/20 11:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote:> On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 22:33 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last >> release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > Gentoo amd64 looks good-ish, except that: > > 1) compiler-rt LSAN seems entirely broken, ThreadDescriptorSize tests > fail too -- I guess once again glibc upgrade broke it. >Is this a regression compared with -rc1 ? -Tom> 2) LLDB tests are broken as usual -- but I'm finally starting to work > on them. >
Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2021-Jan-05 03:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
On 12/18/20 10:33 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:> Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. >It doesn't look like there have been any major issues reported, so if nothing else comes up, I will tag -final on Tuesday. -Tom> -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
Natalia Glagoleva via llvm-dev
2021-Jan-07 20:29 UTC
[llvm-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Openmp-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged
Hi to everyone, I ran these tests https://github.com/uhhpctools/omp-validation on windows with version 11.0.0: D:\NG\omp-validation>"C:\Program Files\LLVM\bin\clang.exe" -v clang version 11.0.0 Target: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc And I see: - Some tests have non-deterministic failures, suggesting that either codegen or runtime has issues - Some tests from compilation to compilation either pass 100% of fail 100%, suggesting that the compilation was non-deterministic I will be happy to share my findings but will suggest to add this testing to your set and do it for current release. Natalia -----Original Message----- From: Openmp-dev <openmp-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Hans Wennborg via Openmp-dev Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 5:02 AM To: Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org>; clang developer list <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>; LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Openmp-dev] [llvm-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged Windows is ready: $ sha256sum LLVM-11.0.1-rc2*.exe af041a8cea522c57d8c89791c33c82986830b3db41e6c787cc811e795eec73d0 LLVM-11.0.1-rc2-win32.exe 5cd6c5ebaba1721150feba2917d23ff4653d0b63ea8eecd0885154e2f1bb9ca5 LLVM-11.0.1-rc2-win64.exe On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:33 AM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last > release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. > > -Tom > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist > s.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fllvm-dev&data=04%7C01% > 7Cnatgla%40microsoft.com%7C80b334860a124fd9a07008d8a41e41a2%7C72f988bf > 86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637439797310256156%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn > 0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Im%2FmKi1%2B8E4b%2FS9o2c04mA8%2B%2FjLL8NYuvs5v4a > slM%2BM%3D&reserved=0_______________________________________________ Openmp-dev mailing list Openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fopenmp-dev&data=04%7C01%7Cnatgla%40microsoft.com%7C80b334860a124fd9a07008d8a41e41a2%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637439797310256156%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=OGnfkZ3NiSBEQqfRFl0SjAT%2Bvf86QS6OEiconiCFgI8%3D&reserved=0