Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-20 05:07 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks, Vitaly. Somebody is looking at this. On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > >> There is some issue, at least on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >> stages but marked as SUCCESS >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks! >>> Done. >>> >>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>> >>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >>>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>> frequently offline. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>>>> for now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >>>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/86fa0fb4/attachment.html>
Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-27 23:32 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Any news regarding false-negatives? +Mitch Phillips <mitchp at google.com> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:> Thanks, Vitaly. > Somebody is looking at this. > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > >> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >> >>> There is some issue, at least on staging. >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >>> stages but marked as SUCCESS >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Done. >>>> >>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Galina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>>> frequently offline. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >>>>>>>>> OK for now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits >>>>>>>>>>> <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, >>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. >>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things >>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201027/edae2788/attachment.html>
Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-27 23:44 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports. On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:> Any news regarding false-negatives? > > +Mitch Phillips <mitchp at google.com> > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks, Vitaly. >> Somebody is looking at this. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed >>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> There is some issue, at least on staging. >>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >>>> stages but marked as SUCCESS >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Done. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the >>>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>>>> frequently offline. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's >>>>>>>>>> OK for now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via >>>>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, >>>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. >>>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things >>>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201027/deff1a3c/attachment.html>