Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-19 18:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
There is some issue, at least on staging. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed stages but marked as SUCCESS On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:> Thanks! > Done. > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! >> Much appreciated. >> >> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >> >> Thanks >> >> Galina >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>> frequently offline. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone! >>>> >>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> They do on staging. >>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>> >>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>> for now. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build >>>>>>> bot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/eea3c0bd/attachment.html>
Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-20 04:56 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:> There is some issue, at least on staging. > http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed > stages but marked as SUCCESS > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> Done. >> >> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area! >>> Much appreciated. >>> >>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Galina >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>> frequently offline. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>> >>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Galina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>>> for now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot. >>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting >>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/a82190b8/attachment.html>
Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-20 05:07 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Thanks, Vitaly. Somebody is looking at this. On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122 > > > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: > >> There is some issue, at least on staging. >> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed >> stages but marked as SUCCESS >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks! >>> Done. >>> >>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging >>>> area! Much appreciated. >>>> >>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. >>>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Galina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was >>>>> frequently offline. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if >>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you >>>>>> move all the green bots back there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Galina >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They do on staging. >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server? >>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot >>>>>>>> annotated commands: >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows >>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc >>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK >>>>>>>> for now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova < >>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It >>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one. >>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production >>>>>>>>> build bot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the >>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Galina >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits < >>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They are online now - >>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new >>>>>>>>>>> buildbot. >>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but >>>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on >>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I >>>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to >>>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to >>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the >>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that >>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements >>>>>>>>>> of the script. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may >>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/86fa0fb4/attachment.html>