Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev
2020-Sep-22 19:24 UTC
[llvm-dev] Now I really have broken the build
Let's see if this one is. I sent it by replying to the email with your post. I should also remember to leave the context below. At 9/22/2020 03:14 PM, Johannes Doerfert wrote:>(OFF TOPIC) > >for me, your emails are not properly nested in the thread for some reason. >If this is the same for others you might want to check your local email setup. > >Thanks, >Â Johanes > > >On 9/22/20 1:59 PM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev wrote: >>Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. When I added the new TableGen reference a couple of weeks ago, I don't recall adding it to any list of documents. It appeared as if every document in the docs/ directories was built.
Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
2020-Sep-22 19:24 UTC
[llvm-dev] Now I really have broken the build
Looks good. Maybe my client was confused for some reason. Apologies for the noise. On 9/22/20 2:24 PM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos wrote:> Let's see if this one is. I sent it by replying to the email with your post. I should also remember to leave the context below. > > At 9/22/2020 03:14 PM, Johannes Doerfert wrote: >> (OFF TOPIC) >> >> for me, your emails are not properly nested in the thread for some reason. >> If this is the same for others you might want to check your local email setup. >> >> Thanks, >> Â Johanes >> >> >> On 9/22/20 1:59 PM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. When I added the new TableGen reference a couple of weeks ago, I don't recall adding it to any list of documents. It appeared as if every document in the docs/ directories was built.
David Chisnall via llvm-dev
2020-Sep-23 11:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] Now I really have broken the build
On 22/09/2020 20:24, Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev wrote:> Looks good. Maybe my client was confused for some reason. Apologies for > the noise.Several of the emails in this thread were missing the In-Reply-To header. Some mail clients (e.g. Thunderbird) will only thread messages if they have a chain using that header or one of the closely related ones. This means you end up with split threads when someone doesn't reply properly. Others (e.g. Apple Mail) will use some heuristics to try to infer threads. This means you end up with weird interleaving of totally unrelated threads when the heuristic is incorrect. In general, if you're replying to a mailing list post, please always use a reply button in your mail client and if your mail client then does not put the correct In-Reply-To header then please file a bug! David