llvm dev - Mar 2018 - LLVM 5.0.2-rc2 has been tagged

Hi,

I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2.  Testers can
begin testing.

-Tom

Hi,

Looks OK here.

SHA256(clang+llvm-5.0.2-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz)=
1c352e71a0d642eb5788ba259785076fa9df94928cf351d9fd6e643b077fb626
SHA256(clang+llvm-5.0.2-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz)=
40369af514a55d8c75d05ec7ba141ce38872b10ba03dc606b1c88e3b5957f712
SHA256(clang+llvm-5.0.2-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz)=
e833e7a27919ad104c52b21abf5351c31e82dea51f8632f57a21c028b0cada97

Thanks,
Simon
________________________________________
From: Release-testers <release-testers-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on
behalf of Tom Stellard via Release-testers <release-testers at
lists.llvm.org>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 4:09:00 AM
To: Release-testers; llvm-dev; cfe-dev
Subject: [Release-testers] LLVM 5.0.2-rc2 has been tagged

Hi,

I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2.  Testers can
begin testing.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2.  Testers can
> begin testing.
> 
So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers.  I am
guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't
normally do X.Y.2 releases.

If you would like to test this release please send me your results,
so we can tag -final.

Thanks,
Tom
> -Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>

Le 20/04/2018 à 18:29, Tom Stellard via Release-testers a
écrit :
> On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2.  Testers can
>> begin testing.
>>
> So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers.  I am
> guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't
> normally do X.Y.2 releases.
I uploaded rc1 immediately (with the version fix) and didn't find any issue!

Cheers,
Sylvestre

W dniu pią, 20.04.2018 o godzinie 09∶29 -0700, użytkownik Tom Stellard
via Release-testers napisał:
> On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2.  Testers
can
> > begin testing.
> > 
> 
> So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers.  I am
> guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't
> normally do X.Y.2 releases.
> 
> If you would like to test this release please send me your results,
> so we can tag -final.
> 
All looks green for Gentoo.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny