Timo Janssen via llvm-dev
2017-Mar-25 20:53 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed?
Cohen, Elad2 via llvm-dev
2017-Mar-27 05:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
AFAIK this should work. At least it worked for me (Built top of trunk llvm using 'clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final)' ). Any specific error you are seeing? I believe there's even a couple of buildbots that use this option (clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules, clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2) One of them seems to be red atm because it's out of space, but they are usually green IIRC. Thanks, Elad -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Timo Janssen via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 23:54 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed? _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Bruno Cardoso Lopes via llvm-dev
2017-Mar-27 20:47 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
Like Elad mentioned, we have few bots that are currently testing this configuration.> So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore?Yes, they are. But they only get fixed/updated once an issue is found or when headers aren't currently figured out via umbrella directives. Please file bugs (and CC me) if you've found issues. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Cohen, Elad2 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> AFAIK this should work. At least it worked for me (Built top of trunk llvm using 'clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final)' ). Any specific error you are seeing? > > I believe there's even a couple of buildbots that use this option (clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules, clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2) One of them seems to be red atm because it's out of space, but they are usually green IIRC. > > Thanks, Elad > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Timo Janssen via llvm-dev > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 23:54 > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: [llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing > > Hallo all, > > > I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES > just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. > > > It didn't work as I almost expected. > > > So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? > > If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that > cmake option also removed? > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- Bruno Cardoso Lopes http://www.brunocardoso.cc
Vassil Vassilev via llvm-dev
2017-Mar-30 09:42 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
Hi Timo, On 25/03/17 21:53, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev wrote:> Hallo all, > > > I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES > just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. > > > It didn't work as I almost expected.Could you be more specific?> > > So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore?There are two bots building llvm with the modulemap-based modules support: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-1 and http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-2 Most of the time they are green. Cheers, Vassil> > If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that > cmake option also removed? > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Timo Janssen via llvm-dev
2017-Apr-02 14:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
I have tried it again. I first build a clang 4.0 final from sources and then tried to build it with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=ON and still errors. I put a file as an attachment to this e-mail with the terminal output. Am 30.03.2017 um 11:42 schrieb Vassil Vassilev:> Hi Timo, > On 25/03/17 21:53, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hallo all, >> >> >> I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES >> just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. >> >> >> It didn't work as I almost expected. > Could you be more specific? >> >> >> So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? > There are two bots building llvm with the modulemap-based modules > support: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-1 and > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-2 > > Most of the time they are green. > > Cheers, Vassil >> >> If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that >> cmake option also removed? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- timo at timo-VirtualBox:~/build$ svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_400/final llvm && svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_400/final llvm/tools/clang && mkdir build && cd build ... timo at timo-VirtualBox:~/build$ clang++ --version clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final 299235) (llvm/tags/RELEASE_400/final 299234) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin timo at timo-VirtualBox:~/build$ cmake -GNinja -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 -DLLVM_ENNABLE_MODULES=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX__COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm/ -- The C compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0 -- The CXX compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0 -- The ASM compiler identification is Clang -- Found assembler: /usr/bin/clang -- Check for working C compiler using: Ninja -- Check for working C compiler using: Ninja -- works -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Detecting C compile features -- Detecting C compile features - done -- Check for working CXX compiler using: Ninja -- Check for working CXX compiler using: Ninja -- works -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done -- Detecting CXX compile features -- Detecting CXX compile features - done -- Performing Test LLVM_NO_OLD_LIBSTDCXX -- Performing Test LLVM_NO_OLD_LIBSTDCXX - Success -- Looking for dirent.h -- Looking for dirent.h - found -- Looking for dlfcn.h -- Looking for dlfcn.h - found -- Looking for errno.h -- Looking for errno.h - found -- Looking for execinfo.h -- Looking for execinfo.h - found -- Looking for fcntl.h -- Looking for fcntl.h - found -- Looking for inttypes.h -- Looking for inttypes.h - found -- Looking for link.h -- Looking for link.h - found -- Looking for malloc.h -- Looking for malloc.h - found -- Looking for malloc/malloc.h -- Looking for malloc/malloc.h - not found -- Looking for ndir.h -- Looking for ndir.h - not found -- Looking for pthread.h -- Looking for pthread.h - found -- Looking for signal.h -- Looking for signal.h - found -- Looking for stdint.h -- Looking for stdint.h - found -- Looking for sys/dir.h -- Looking for sys/dir.h - found -- Looking for sys/ioctl.h -- Looking for sys/ioctl.h - found -- Looking for sys/mman.h -- Looking for sys/mman.h - found -- Looking for sys/ndir.h -- Looking for sys/ndir.h - not found -- Looking for sys/param.h -- Looking for sys/param.h - found -- Looking for sys/resource.h -- Looking for sys/resource.h - found -- Looking for sys/stat.h -- Looking for sys/stat.h - found -- Looking for sys/time.h -- Looking for sys/time.h - found -- Looking for sys/types.h -- Looking for sys/types.h - found -- Looking for sys/uio.h -- Looking for sys/uio.h - found -- Looking for termios.h -- Looking for termios.h - found -- Looking for unistd.h -- Looking for unistd.h - found -- Looking for valgrind/valgrind.h -- Looking for valgrind/valgrind.h - found -- Looking for zlib.h -- Looking for zlib.h - found -- Looking for fenv.h -- Looking for fenv.h - found -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT - found -- Looking for FE_INEXACT -- Looking for FE_INEXACT - found -- Looking for mach/mach.h -- Looking for mach/mach.h - not found -- Looking for histedit.h -- Looking for histedit.h - found -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h - not found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Looking for pthread_getspecific in pthread -- Looking for pthread_getspecific in pthread - found -- Looking for pthread_rwlock_init in pthread -- Looking for pthread_rwlock_init in pthread - found -- Looking for pthread_mutex_lock in pthread -- Looking for pthread_mutex_lock in pthread - found -- Looking for dlopen in dl -- Looking for dlopen in dl - found -- Looking for clock_gettime in rt -- Looking for clock_gettime in rt - found -- Looking for pthread.h -- Looking for pthread.h - found -- Looking for pthread_create -- Looking for pthread_create - not found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads -- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads - not found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Found Threads: TRUE -- Looking for compress2 in z -- Looking for compress2 in z - found -- Looking for el_init in edit -- Looking for el_init in edit - found -- Looking for setupterm in tinfo -- Looking for setupterm in tinfo - found -- Looking for xar_open in xar -- Looking for xar_open in xar - not found -- Looking for arc4random -- Looking for arc4random - not found -- Looking for backtrace -- Looking for backtrace - found -- Looking for _Unwind_Backtrace -- Looking for _Unwind_Backtrace - found -- Looking for getpagesize -- Looking for getpagesize - found -- Looking for sysconf -- Looking for sysconf - found -- Looking for getrusage -- Looking for getrusage - found -- Looking for setrlimit -- Looking for setrlimit - found -- Looking for isatty -- Looking for isatty - found -- Looking for futimens -- Looking for futimens - found -- Looking for futimes -- Looking for futimes - found -- Looking for posix_fallocate -- Looking for posix_fallocate - found -- Looking for sigaltstack -- Looking for sigaltstack - found -- Looking for writev -- Looking for writev - found -- Looking for lseek64 -- Looking for lseek64 - found -- Looking for mallctl -- Looking for mallctl - not found -- Looking for mallinfo -- Looking for mallinfo - found -- Looking for malloc_zone_statistics -- Looking for malloc_zone_statistics - not found -- Looking for mkdtemp -- Looking for mkdtemp - found -- Looking for mkstemp -- Looking for mkstemp - found -- Looking for mktemp -- Looking for mktemp - found -- Looking for getcwd -- Looking for getcwd - found -- Looking for gettimeofday -- Looking for gettimeofday - found -- Looking for getrlimit -- Looking for getrlimit - found -- Looking for posix_spawn -- Looking for posix_spawn - found -- Looking for pread -- Looking for pread - found -- Looking for realpath -- Looking for realpath - found -- Looking for sbrk -- Looking for sbrk - found -- Looking for strtoll -- Looking for strtoll - found -- Looking for strerror -- Looking for strerror - found -- Looking for strerror_r -- Looking for strerror_r - found -- Looking for strerror_s -- Looking for strerror_s - not found -- Looking for setenv -- Looking for setenv - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_GNU_ZERO_VARIADIC_MACRO_ARGUMENTS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_GNU_ZERO_VARIADIC_MACRO_ARGUMENTS_FLAG - Success -- Native target architecture is X86 -- Threads enabled. -- Doxygen disabled. -- Sphinx disabled. -- Go bindings enabled. -- Could NOT find OCaml (missing: OCAMLFIND OCAML_VERSION OCAML_STDLIB_PATH) -- Could NOT find OCaml (missing: OCAMLFIND OCAML_VERSION OCAML_STDLIB_PATH) -- OCaml bindings disabled. -- LLVM host triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- LLVM default target triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FPIC -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FPIC - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FPIC -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FPIC - Success -- Building with -fPIC -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_FVISIBILITY_INLINES_HIDDEN_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_FVISIBILITY_INLINES_HIDDEN_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_MISSING_FIELD_INITIALIZERS_FLAG -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_MISSING_FIELD_INITIALIZERS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_COVERED_SWITCH_DEFAULT_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test CXX_WONT_WARN_ON_FINAL_NONVIRTUALDTOR -- Performing Test CXX_WONT_WARN_ON_FINAL_NONVIRTUALDTOR - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_DELETE_NON_VIRTUAL_DTOR_FLAG -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_DELETE_NON_VIRTUAL_DTOR_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_DELETE_NON_VIRTUAL_DTOR_FLAG -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_DELETE_NON_VIRTUAL_DTOR_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test C_WCOMMENT_ALLOWS_LINE_WRAP -- Performing Test C_WCOMMENT_ALLOWS_LINE_WRAP - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_STRING_CONVERSION_FLAG -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_STRING_CONVERSION_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_STRING_CONVERSION_FLAG -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_STRING_CONVERSION_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_WERROR_DATE_TIME -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_WERROR_DATE_TIME - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_DATE_TIME -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_DATE_TIME - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_CXX11 -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_CXX11 - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_MODULES -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_MODULES - Success -- Performing Test LINKER_SUPPORTS_COLOR_DIAGNOSTICS -- Performing Test LINKER_SUPPORTS_COLOR_DIAGNOSTICS - Failed -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FNO_FUNCTION_SECTIONS -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FNO_FUNCTION_SECTIONS - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FFUNCTION_SECTIONS -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FFUNCTION_SECTIONS - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FFUNCTION_SECTIONS -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FFUNCTION_SECTIONS - Success -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS -- Performing Test C_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS - Success -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_FDATA_SECTIONS - Success -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.7 (found version "2.7.12") -- Constructing LLVMBuild project information -- Targeting X86 -- Looking for sys/resource.h -- Looking for sys/resource.h - found -- Clang version: 4.0.0 -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_NO_NESTED_ANON_TYPES_FLAG -- Performing Test CXX_SUPPORTS_NO_NESTED_ANON_TYPES_FLAG - Success -- Configuring done -- Generating done -- Build files have been written to: /home/timo/build timo at timo-VirtualBox: ~/build$ ninja [0/2048] Building CXX object lib/Suppo...upport.dir/RandomNumberGenerator.cpp.o ... [85/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp...CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Mutex.cpp.o FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Mutex.cpp.o /usr/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Support -I/home/timo/llvm/lib/Support -Iinclude -I/home/timo/llvm/include -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wcovered-switch-default -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wstring-conversion -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=/home/timo/build/module.cache -Xclang -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility -fcolor-diagnostics -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -DNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -MMD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Mutex.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Mutex.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Mutex.cpp.o -c /home/timo/llvm/lib/Support/Mutex.cpp /home/timo/llvm/lib/Support/Mutex.cpp:49:42: error: definition of '' must be imported from one of the following modules before it is required: LLVM_Support_DataTypes LLVM_C.lto static_cast<pthread_mutex_t*>(malloc(sizeof(pthread_mutex_t))); ^ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/pthreadtypes.h:90:9: note: previous definition is here typedef union ^ error generated. [86/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp...Files/LLVMSupport.dir/YAMLParser.cpp.o [87/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp...s/LLVMSupport.dir/DynamicLibrary.cpp.o [88/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp...MakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Memory.cpp.o [89/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp.../CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Host.cpp.o [90/2048] Building CXX object lib/Supp...CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Dwarf.cpp.o ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev
2017-Apr-03 20:08 UTC
[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 2:42 AM, Vassil Vassilev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > On 25/03/17 21:53, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hallo all, >> >> >> I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. >> >> >> It didn't work as I almost expected. > Could you be more specific? >> >> >> So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? > There are two bots building llvm with the modulemap-based modules support: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-1 and http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-2 <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-2>These two run Linux, and then there is also one running on macOS in the green dragon Jenkins instance: http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-modulesRDA/ <http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-modulesRDA/> -- adrian> > Most of the time they are green. > > Cheers, Vassil >> >> If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170403/5dd2f2c2/attachment.html>