llvm dev - Mar 2017 - [GSoC] Mentor qualification guidelines

> On Mar 18, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> (Adding Anton here)
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM Roel Jordans via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> On 17-03-17 22:34, Mehdi Amini wrote:
> >> On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Roel Jordans via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a question related to GSoC.  One of my students submitted
an idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in (co-)mentoring this
project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements for acting as a
mentor.  Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here?
> > We don’t have any explicit requirement.
> >
> >> I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly on
projects outside of the main LLVM repository.  At our university we are
currently maintaining two backends for our own custom architectures and last
year we started a new compiler course based on LLVM [2] where we have several
assignments with the LLVM internals.
> >>
> >> I think that I'm reasonably familiar with LLVM to help guide
this project but I'm not sure what the community involvement requirements
are for example.  I also remember some posts from last year where there were
other people asking similar questions so I expect that further clarification of
this may help in general as well.
> > I would (personally) be happy for you to co-mentor any student, I feel
we’d need someone with a track of contributions in LLVM  to co-mentor with you
though.
> > (this is just my personal opinion and it’s not worth more anyone
else’s ;))
> Thanks for your answer.  That matches quite well with my expectation, I
> would also appreciate it if a more experienced LLVM contributor would
> co-mentor with me.  I expect that that will benefit the project quite a
bit.
> 
> 
> In general, I think I'd prefer that the official mentor
We’ve had multiple official co-mentors in the past (just to clarify on the
possibility because you used the singular for mentor here).

— 
Mehdi


> be an llvm contributor, however, any assistance that you give a GSoC
student would be very appreciated.
> 
> I've roped in Anton as (IIRC) the official organizer for GSoC and llvm.
> 
> -eric
> 
>  
> Cheers,
>   Roel
> > Best,
> >
> > —
> > Mehdi
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170318/1362a340/attachment.html>

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> (Adding Anton here)
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM Roel Jordans via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 17-03-17 22:34, Mehdi Amini wrote:
> >> On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Roel Jordans via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a question related to GSoC.  One of my students submitted
an
> idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in (co-)mentoring
> this project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements for
acting as
> a mentor.  Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here?
> > We don’t have any explicit requirement.
> >
> >> I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly on
> projects outside of the main LLVM repository.  At our university we are
> currently maintaining two backends for our own custom architectures and
> last year we started a new compiler course based on LLVM [2] where we have
> several assignments with the LLVM internals.
> >>
> >> I think that I'm reasonably familiar with LLVM to help guide
this
> project but I'm not sure what the community involvement requirements
are
> for example.  I also remember some posts from last year where there were
> other people asking similar questions so I expect that further
> clarification of this may help in general as well.
> > I would (personally) be happy for you to co-mentor any student, I feel
> we’d need someone with a track of contributions in LLVM  to co-mentor with
> you though.
> > (this is just my personal opinion and it’s not worth more anyone
else’s
> ;))
> Thanks for your answer.  That matches quite well with my expectation, I
> would also appreciate it if a more experienced LLVM contributor would
> co-mentor with me.  I expect that that will benefit the project quite a
> bit.
>
>
> In general, I think I'd prefer that the official mentor
>
>
> We’ve had multiple official co-mentors in the past (just to clarify on the
> possibility because you used the singular for mentor here).
>
>
I did, but I was thinking more of the filling out the evaluation portion
rather than any sort of "helping with llvm" capacity.

"If there are multiple mentors, only one mentor will complete the
evaluation (decide amongst yourselves who that will be beforehand)."

-eric

> —
> Mehdi
>
>
>
> be an llvm contributor, however, any assistance that you give a GSoC
> student would be very appreciated.
>
> I've roped in Anton as (IIRC) the official organizer for GSoC and llvm.
>
> -eric
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Roel
> > Best,
> >
> > —
> > Mehdi
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170319/77c805e8/attachment.html>

> On Mar 18, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com
<mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com
<mailto:echristo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> (Adding Anton here)
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM Roel Jordans via llvm-dev <llvm-dev
at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> On 17-03-17 22:34, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>> >> On Mar 17, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Roel Jordans via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I have a question related to GSoC.  One of my students
submitted an idea [1] for a GSoC project and I would be interested in
(co-)mentoring this project but I'm unsure of the qualification requirements
for acting as a mentor.  Is there anyone that can clarify the requirements here?
>> > We don’t have any explicit requirement.
>> >
>> >> I have been working with LLVM for several years now but mostly
on projects outside of the main LLVM repository.  At our university we are
currently maintaining two backends for our own custom architectures and last
year we started a new compiler course based on LLVM [2] where we have several
assignments with the LLVM internals.
>> >>
>> >> I think that I'm reasonably familiar with LLVM to help
guide this project but I'm not sure what the community involvement
requirements are for example.  I also remember some posts from last year where
there were other people asking similar questions so I expect that further
clarification of this may help in general as well.
>> > I would (personally) be happy for you to co-mentor any student, I
feel we’d need someone with a track of contributions in LLVM  to co-mentor with
you though.
>> > (this is just my personal opinion and it’s not worth more anyone
else’s ;))
>> Thanks for your answer.  That matches quite well with my expectation, I
>> would also appreciate it if a more experienced LLVM contributor would
>> co-mentor with me.  I expect that that will benefit the project quite a
bit.
>> 
>> 
>> In general, I think I'd prefer that the official mentor
> 
> We’ve had multiple official co-mentors in the past (just to clarify on the
possibility because you used the singular for mentor here).
> 
> 
> I did, but I was thinking more of the filling out the evaluation portion
rather than any sort of "helping with llvm" capacity.
> 
> "If there are multiple mentors, only one mentor will complete the
evaluation (decide amongst yourselves who that will be beforehand).”
Oh Ok, makes sense to me :)

— 
Mehdi


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170318/c4f14d32/attachment.html>