llvm dev - Mar 2017 - sancov reporting all locations as <invalid>:0

Justin,

I haven't seen this before. I suspect it is because of line-tables-only.
Can you try it with full debug info?

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:36 PM Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
wrote:
> +aizatsky
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at
justinbogner.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look at
> how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
>
>   http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
>
> First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
> passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
> generated a .sancov file for me.
>
> However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
> numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the
covered and
> uncovered functions successfully, but without locations it's really
hard
> to do anything with that information.
>
> I've built with -gline-tables-only, as is the default when building
llvm
> with sanitizers enabled.
>
> Have you seen this before? Am I doing something obviously wrong?
>
>
> --
Mike
Sent from phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170307/a2e0a363/attachment.html>

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Mike Aizatsky <aizatsky at google.com>
wrote:
> Justin,
>
> I haven't seen this before. I suspect it is because of
line-tables-only.
> Can you try it with full debug info?
>
That would be strange.
-gline-tables-only is *the* recommended flag for all of the sanitizers, I'd
expect it to work.


>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:36 PM Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
wrote:
>
>> +aizatsky
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at
justinbogner.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look
at
>> how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
>>
>>   http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
>>
>> First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
>> passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
>> generated a .sancov file for me.
>>
>> However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
>> numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the
covered and
>> uncovered functions successfully, but without locations it's really
hard
>> to do anything with that information.
>>
>> I've built with -gline-tables-only, as is the default when building
llvm
>> with sanitizers enabled.
>>
>> Have you seen this before? Am I doing something obviously wrong?
>>
>>
>> --
> Mike
> Sent from phone
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170307/ff14216f/attachment.html>

I'll need more details then. Maybe you can share the binary & its
.sancov
file? Or if you have a way to reproduce it?

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:23 PM Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Mike Aizatsky <aizatsky at
google.com>
> wrote:
>
> Justin,
>
> I haven't seen this before. I suspect it is because of
line-tables-only.
> Can you try it with full debug info?
>
>
> That would be strange.
> -gline-tables-only is *the* recommended flag for all of the sanitizers,
> I'd expect it to work.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:36 PM Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
wrote:
>
> +aizatsky
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at
justinbogner.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm working on a fuzzer using libFuzzer and I wanted to take a look at
> how my coverage was doing, as per the instructions here:
>
>   http://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#how-good-is-my-fuzzer
>
> First of all, I suspect the instructions there are out of date, but
> passing -dump_coverage=1 to the binary rather than setting ASAN_OPTIONS
> generated a .sancov file for me.
>
> However, when I inspect this with the sancov tool, all of the line
> numbers it reports are "<invalid>:0". I can list the
covered and
> uncovered functions successfully, but without locations it's really
hard
> to do anything with that information.
>
> I've built with -gline-tables-only, as is the default when building
llvm
> with sanitizers enabled.
>
> Have you seen this before? Am I doing something obviously wrong?
>
>
> --
> Mike
> Sent from phone
>
> --
Mike
Sent from phone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170307/1cef08e5/attachment.html>