Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-17 18:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
I see in that code review page that LLD is built in the test-release script. Happy to see that. Now I'm thinking about package maintainers such as Debian, and hoping that they will pick up LLD and make it available with this next release. What is different about this release that will clue Debian developers and other package managers that they should include LLD with this release? How can we communicate to package maintainers to do this? Regards, Andrew On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, > we've > >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some others > >> that will know the details. > > > > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's > > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this > > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches > > and experimental in others. > > > > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. > > Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 > > -Dimitry > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170217/e04064ae/attachment-0001.html>
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-17 18:55 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I see in that code review page that LLD is built in the test-release > script. Happy to see that. Now I'm thinking about package maintainers such > as Debian, and hoping that they will pick up LLD and make it available with > this next release. What is different about this release that will clue > Debian developers and other package managers that they should include LLD > with this release? How can we communicate to package maintainers to do this? >Well, maybe saying something like this is enough? LLD is a linker from the LLVM project and is getting popular because of its compatibility with GNU linker (it's a drop-in replacement) and the performance (usually more than 2x faster than GNU gold). It's relatively new but already able to build the entire FreeBSD base system. So it's nice to have it as a package. Actually I think now is a good timing to start including LLD as a OS package as it got mature enough to be used in daily basis. Our release schedule and version number are coupled with the entire LLVM release, so it is LLD 4.0, but if it were an independent project, we'd probably be seriously thinking about naming it LLD 1.0 this time. Regards,> Andrew > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev >> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, >> we've >> >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some >> others >> >> that will know the details. >> > >> > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's >> > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this >> > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches >> > and experimental in others. >> > >> > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. >> >> Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 >> >> -Dimitry >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170217/171302c5/attachment.html>
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-17 22:21 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
Sylvestre, are you still the Debian package manager for LLVM? Can you make an lld release as well? Doko, same for Ubuntu. If not, could you please contact the current managers? We are now including it on 4.0 RC2. It would be good to have it at least for x86 and Aarch64, but if it's OK to release experimental things, I'd also like to have it on ARM. Others may want for their targets as well. Cheers, Renato On 17 Feb 2017 18:28, "Andrew Kelley" <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote:> I see in that code review page that LLD is built in the test-release > script. Happy to see that. Now I'm thinking about package maintainers such > as Debian, and hoping that they will pick up LLD and make it available with > this next release. What is different about this release that will clue > Debian developers and other package managers that they should include LLD > with this release? How can we communicate to package maintainers to do this? > > Regards, > Andrew > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > >> > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev >> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, >> we've >> >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some >> others >> >> that will know the details. >> > >> > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's >> > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this >> > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches >> > and experimental in others. >> > >> > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. >> >> Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 >> >> -Dimitry >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170217/c8fd7049/attachment.html>
Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-18 08:09 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
Already the case with 4.0 and on apt.llvm.org :) Le 17 février 2017 23:21:17 GMT+01:00, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> a écrit :>Sylvestre, are you still the Debian package manager for LLVM? Can you >make >an lld release as well? Doko, same for Ubuntu. If not, could you please >contact the current managers? > >We are now including it on 4.0 RC2. It would be good to have it at >least >for x86 and Aarch64, but if it's OK to release experimental things, I'd >also like to have it on ARM. Others may want for their targets as well. > >Cheers, >Renato > >On 17 Feb 2017 18:28, "Andrew Kelley" <superjoe30 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I see in that code review page that LLD is built in the test-release >> script. Happy to see that. Now I'm thinking about package maintainers >such >> as Debian, and hoping that they will pick up LLD and make it >available with >> this next release. What is different about this release that will >clue >> Debian developers and other package managers that they should include >LLD >> with this release? How can we communicate to package maintainers to >do this? >> >> Regards, >> Andrew >> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev >>> > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At >least, >>> we've >>> >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some >>> others >>> >> that will know the details. >>> > >>> > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe >it's >>> > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it >this >>> > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some >arches >>> > and experimental in others. >>> > >>> > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. >>> >>> Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: >https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 >>> >>> -Dimitry >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >>> >>> >>-- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170218/611073d3/attachment.html>