On 9 February 2017 at 17:31, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote:> Ping. Does anyone else have thoughts on this?Hi Amara, It seems the people who replied in this thread are mostly in sync with the proposal, why don't you push a review in phab, and let's take this to the next level? cheers, --renato
Agreed, I'll add some langref doc changes to the prototype patches and post them for review. Thanks, Amara On 10 February 2017 at 10:00, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 9 February 2017 at 17:31, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote: >> Ping. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? > > Hi Amara, > > It seems the people who replied in this thread are mostly in sync with > the proposal, why don't you push a review in phab, and let's take this > to the next level? > > cheers, > --renato
Hi folks, The first patch with LangRef updates is ready for review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D30086 Thanks, Amara On 10 February 2017 at 16:47, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote:> Agreed, I'll add some langref doc changes to the prototype patches and > post them for review. > > Thanks, > Amara > > On 10 February 2017 at 10:00, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 9 February 2017 at 17:31, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ping. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? >> >> Hi Amara, >> >> It seems the people who replied in this thread are mostly in sync with >> the proposal, why don't you push a review in phab, and let's take this >> to the next level? >> >> cheers, >> --renato