I suggest starting another thread for this. Anyone who cares about X86 should be
able to chime in and this thread is about the vectorize.
—
Mehdi
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Rackover, Zvi via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Elena would be more suitable to respond, but since she is on vacation, I
will take the liberty of responding.
> Nadav, thanks for the tremendous contributions you made in the past years.
> Michael, thanks for agreeing to take on this job.
> I spoke to several peers at Intel and we all agreed that Craig would a good
choice.
>
> Zvi
> <>
> <>From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org
<mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>] On Behalf Of Renato Golin via
llvm-dev
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 09:28
> To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at
google.com>>
> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Vectorizers code ownership
>
> On 9 Nov 2016 06:04, "Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev
at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> > Just my two cents, but if Craig is up for it, I think this would be a
pretty great fit.
>
> +1
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161109/b891f7bb/attachment.html>