On 30 September 2016 at 14:21, Eric Liu via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Thanks for the feedback Aaron! :) > > I've disabled it. I think the annoying part really is the status (e.g. > Request, Closed etc) in the tag, and I am wondering if a tag with just line > numbers like "(N Loc)" would be better. But I'm not really sure about the > trade-off here.I'd suggest that [PATCH] is a waste of screen real estate too - the `Dnnnnn:` prefix makes it obvious. I do appreciate there's an argument for having it for consistency with people who post patches directly to llvm-commits. Alex
Is there any way to disable emails when a revision is closed? I always find those annoying, especially when it's a mass closing to clean out your dashboard On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 7:45 AM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On 30 September 2016 at 14:21, Eric Liu via llvm-commits > <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback Aaron! :) > > > > I've disabled it. I think the annoying part really is the status (e.g. > > Request, Closed etc) in the tag, and I am wondering if a tag with just > line > > numbers like "(N Loc)" would be better. But I'm not really sure about the > > trade-off here. > > I'd suggest that [PATCH] is a waste of screen real estate too - the > `Dnnnnn:` prefix makes it obvious. I do appreciate there's an argument > for having it for consistency with people who post patches directly to > llvm-commits. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160930/1e32afaf/attachment.html>
@Alex I tried glancing through emails in llvm-commits, and I found "[PATCH]" makes it easier to tell revisions from patches, and I guess people are also used to "[PATCH]" after all these years :) @Zachary Yes! This option can be configured in "Email Preferences" in your personal setting, but I'm not sure if this should be disabled globally. For me personally, I'd like to be notified when a patch I am following is closed. Although I am happy to make these changes if people want :) Thanks, Eric On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:52 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: Is there any way to disable emails when a revision is closed? I always find those annoying, especially when it's a mass closing to clean out your dashboard On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 7:45 AM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: On 30 September 2016 at 14:21, Eric Liu via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Thanks for the feedback Aaron! :) > > I've disabled it. I think the annoying part really is the status (e.g. > Request, Closed etc) in the tag, and I am wondering if a tag with justline> numbers like "(N Loc)" would be better. But I'm not really sure about the > trade-off here.I'd suggest that [PATCH] is a waste of screen real estate too - the `Dnnnnn:` prefix makes it obvious. I do appreciate there's an argument for having it for consistency with people who post patches directly to llvm-commits. Alex _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160930/e18aad92/attachment.html>