The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround seems to be 3.5 hours. clang: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html lld: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html polly: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html> On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 07:03 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: >> I've configured the bot to test lld and polly. The first batch of reports >> for >> the new tools are not ready yet, but anyone can monitor the build: >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Experimental/job/clang-stage2-coverage-R/ >> >> Matthias, I will ask around about adding a link to this bot on llvm.org >> once it >> graduates from the Experimental pane on greendragon. > > Thank you! Polly is now available, but individual sites are not > accessible: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/polly/lib/Transform/FlattenSchedule.cpp.html > > I get: Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access > /coverage/coverage-reports/clang/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/polly/lib/Transform/FlattenSchedule.cpp.html > on this server.This should be fixed now. vedant> > Best, > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016, at 08:30 PM, Vedant Kumar wrote:> The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround > seems to > be 3.5 hours. > > clang: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html > > lld: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html > > polly: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.htmlPerfect. I added a link from the Polly website. Best, Tobias
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround > seems to > be 3.5 hours. > > clang: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html > > lld: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.htmlThis seems like a bug in the coverage generation: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Symbols.cpp.html#L31 It shows `switch (Body.kind()) {` with zero counts even though code it dominates has counts. -- Sean Silva> > > polly: > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html > > > > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 07:03 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: > >> I've configured the bot to test lld and polly. The first batch of > reports > >> for > >> the new tools are not ready yet, but anyone can monitor the build: > >> > >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Experimental/job/ > clang-stage2-coverage-R/ > >> > >> Matthias, I will ask around about adding a link to this bot on llvm.org > >> once it > >> graduates from the Experimental pane on greendragon. > > > > Thank you! Polly is now available, but individual sites are not > > accessible: > > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/coverage/Users/ > buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/polly/ > lib/Transform/FlattenSchedule.cpp.html > > > > I get: Forbidden > > > > You don't have permission to access > > /coverage/coverage-reports/clang/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/ > sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/polly/ > lib/Transform/FlattenSchedule.cpp.html > > on this server. > > This should be fixed now. > > vedant > > > > > > Best, > > Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160926/0a4f3894/attachment.html>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround >> seems to >> be 3.5 hours. >> >> clang: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html >> >> lld: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html > > > > This seems like a bug in the coverage generation: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Symbols.cpp.html#L31 > > It shows `switch (Body.kind()) {` with zero counts even though code it > dominates has counts. >Also, I think that at some point we could teach coverage about llvm_unreachable() (or the other way around, maybe annotating), so that we don't get zero counts as in here, e.g. void TargetInfo::relaxTlsIeToLe() http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Target.cpp.html -- Davide
On 26 September 2016 at 03:32, Sean Silva via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround >> seems to >> be 3.5 hours. >> >> clang: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html >> >> lld: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html > > > > This seems like a bug in the coverage generation: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/ > coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang- > stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Symbols.cpp.html#L31 > > It shows `switch (Body.kind()) {` with zero counts even though code it > dominates has counts. >I committed a fix for this issue yesterday. The coverage reports should be looking better now when it comes to switches. Alex> > -- Sean Silva > > >> >> >> polly: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html >> >> >> > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 07:03 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> I've configured the bot to test lld and polly. The first batch of >> reports >> >> for >> >> the new tools are not ready yet, but anyone can monitor the build: >> >> >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/Experimental/job/clang- >> stage2-coverage-R/ >> >> >> >> Matthias, I will ask around about adding a link to this bot on >> llvm.org >> >> once it >> >> graduates from the Experimental pane on greendragon. >> > >> > Thank you! Polly is now available, but individual sites are not >> > accessible: >> > >> > http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/ >> coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang- >> stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/tools/polly/lib/Transform/ >> FlattenSchedule.cpp.html >> > >> > I get: Forbidden >> > >> > You don't have permission to access >> > /coverage/coverage-reports/clang/coverage/Users/buildslave/ >> jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at 2/llvm/ >> tools/polly/lib/Transform/FlattenSchedule.cpp.html >> > on this server. >> >> This should be fixed now. >> >> vedant >> >> >> > >> > Best, >> > Tobias >> > _______________________________________________ >> > LLVM Developers mailing list >> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160928/4a2dcf75/attachment.html>