Wink Saville via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-13 01:38 UTC
[llvm-dev] -fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
I've updated the arch linux bug (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50385) with a patch for glibc in the arch linux packages that does fix the segment fault for me. On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 12 September 2016 at 22:02, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com> wrote: >> I then cloned the gcc 2.24 sources as of today and the code that >> 24e2b1cede1952d7d4411a3cafd25dd8593dab9f reverts is still there. I >> also took a quick look at the Arch Linux glibc package >> (https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/glibc) >> and don't see any local patches. > > Right, I'm not expecting glibc itself to be patched by now, but if > this impacts Arch and Open Mandriva, then both should revert locally, > at least until it's fixed upstream. > > I also didn't see any patch on the Arch and I'm not sure how to > contact the packager. > > Can you reply on the bug you opened about the (slight) progress we're > making? Ask someone to try reverting the patch? I don't have a chroot > just for that and I don't want to mess up my environment. :) > > cheers, > --renato
Evgenii Stepanov via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-20 23:09 UTC
[llvm-dev] -fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24736 would probably fix this On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Wink Saville via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I've updated the arch linux bug (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50385) with > a patch for glibc in the arch linux packages that does fix the segment > fault for me. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 12 September 2016 at 22:02, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com> wrote: >>> I then cloned the gcc 2.24 sources as of today and the code that >>> 24e2b1cede1952d7d4411a3cafd25dd8593dab9f reverts is still there. I >>> also took a quick look at the Arch Linux glibc package >>> (https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/glibc) >>> and don't see any local patches. >> >> Right, I'm not expecting glibc itself to be patched by now, but if >> this impacts Arch and Open Mandriva, then both should revert locally, >> at least until it's fixed upstream. >> >> I also didn't see any patch on the Arch and I'm not sure how to >> contact the packager. >> >> Can you reply on the bug you opened about the (slight) progress we're >> making? Ask someone to try reverting the patch? I don't have a chroot >> just for that and I don't want to mess up my environment. :) >> >> cheers, >> --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Wink Saville via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-21 00:23 UTC
[llvm-dev] -fsanitize=memory failing on 3.9.0
I hope so. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, 4:09 PM Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote:> https://reviews.llvm.org/D24736 would probably fix this > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Wink Saville via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I've updated the arch linux bug (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50385) > with > > a patch for glibc in the arch linux packages that does fix the segment > > fault for me. > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> On 12 September 2016 at 22:02, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com> wrote: > >>> I then cloned the gcc 2.24 sources as of today and the code that > >>> 24e2b1cede1952d7d4411a3cafd25dd8593dab9f reverts is still there. I > >>> also took a quick look at the Arch Linux glibc package > >>> ( > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/glibc > ) > >>> and don't see any local patches. > >> > >> Right, I'm not expecting glibc itself to be patched by now, but if > >> this impacts Arch and Open Mandriva, then both should revert locally, > >> at least until it's fixed upstream. > >> > >> I also didn't see any patch on the Arch and I'm not sure how to > >> contact the packager. > >> > >> Can you reply on the bug you opened about the (slight) progress we're > >> making? Ask someone to try reverting the patch? I don't have a chroot > >> just for that and I don't want to mess up my environment. :) > >> > >> cheers, > >> --renato > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160921/fcda7338/attachment.html>