Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 22:24 UTC
[llvm-dev] Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?
On 5 September 2016 at 23:04, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:> Let's first see how bad it is once bots are fixed to build the latest > revision. It's only been a few days and that includes a weekend.Of course. I'll wait until all our bots return from the first round to know the size of the damage. I just wanted to warn all other buildbot owners and general public that we do have a tough situation going, and if their patches are not essential, maybe voluntarily hold on for a while would be a good idea. (Though, now that I read my email, it does sound alarmist. I'm in panic mode right now, so I apologise :). But all other affected bots won't come back until Galina reverts and restart the master (or until their owners work around like I did). There's no way of knowing how bad it is if the bots continue chugging bogus green status to every commit... cheers, --renato
Vasileios Kalintiris via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 22:28 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?
Hi Renato, do we have an idea which was the latest commit that the buildbots (really) tested? - V. Kalintiris ________________________________________ From: cfe-dev [cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Renato Golin via cfe-dev [cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org] Sent: 05 September 2016 23:24 To: Krzysztof Parzyszek Cc: LLVM Dev; Clang Dev Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop? On 5 September 2016 at 23:04, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:> Let's first see how bad it is once bots are fixed to build the latest > revision. It's only been a few days and that includes a weekend.Of course. I'll wait until all our bots return from the first round to know the size of the damage. I just wanted to warn all other buildbot owners and general public that we do have a tough situation going, and if their patches are not essential, maybe voluntarily hold on for a while would be a good idea. (Though, now that I read my email, it does sound alarmist. I'm in panic mode right now, so I apologise :). But all other affected bots won't come back until Galina reverts and restart the master (or until their owners work around like I did). There's no way of knowing how bad it is if the bots continue chugging bogus green status to every commit... cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 22:36 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?
On 5 September 2016 at 23:28, Vasileios Kalintiris <Vasileios.Kalintiris at imgtec.com> wrote:> Hi Renato, do we have an idea which was the latest commit that the buildbots (really) tested?No idea, as Galina said SVN was out of sync on the 2nd (18pm her local time). I'm guessing the problem already existed by then for a long time. Right now I'm trying to put out the fires, not worry about the range. Our first bot [1] broke lots of tests, and I was lucky to find commits in those areas since the 2nd, so I already fired the email and I expect those patches to be preemptively reverted. Also, ARM can't self-host anymore [2], and I'm trying 280555 which is around the time of her email. If that fails, I'll be going back ~100 commits or so at a time. Our other bots are falling down like rotten apples [3], and I'll be going through one at a time... :( --renato [1] http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15/builds/14952 [2] http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost/builds/7685 [3] http://llvm.tcwglab.linaro.org/monitor/
Zachary Turner via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-06 01:53 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM Vasileios Kalintiris via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hi Renato, do we have an idea which was the latest commit that the > buildbots (really) tested? > > - V. Kalintiris >I can tell you that at least for one of the buildbots I follow, this <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x64-ninja-win7/builds/15319> is the last build that was actually tested. You can see the slave losing connection with the master during the "ninja check 2" stage, and if you change the URL to look at build 15320 (the next build) you'll see that the "build stage 1" drops to 0 seconds and remains that way on subsequent builds. So, somewhere around SVN r280562 (Friday 17:38 Pacific Time) is going to be the last tested build, but each bot will be on a slightly different revision around that time. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160906/6f76c7d5/attachment.html>