Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 21:26 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Many bots don't build anything -- does anyone know why?
On 5 September 2016 at 22:12, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> Should we revert this? This is pretty serious? Can we fix this quickly > on the bots?Just FYI, I'm moving the "llvm" directory away and making it as a symlink to "llvm.src", at least until we sort out this problem. Since this has been going on from Sep 1st, I believe we'll find *many* breakages in the bots... :( cheers, --renato
Nico Weber via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 21:54 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Many bots don't build anything -- does anyone know why?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 5 September 2016 at 22:12, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > > Should we revert this? This is pretty serious? Can we fix this quickly > > on the bots? > > Just FYI, I'm moving the "llvm" directory away and making it as a > symlink to "llvm.src", at least until we sort out this problem. > > Since this has been going on from Sep 1st, I believe we'll find *many* > breakages in the bots... :( >That's 4 days, and the clang_fast bots are still testing things. I expect that some stuff will be broken, but I don't think it'll be _that_ bad. +1 to fixing quickly, but from what I understand just reverting isn't enough since the master needs to be restarted after the revert for it to have an effect. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160905/bb741923/attachment.html>
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-05 22:00 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Many bots don't build anything -- does anyone know why?
On 5 September 2016 at 22:54, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:> That's 4 days, and the clang_fast bots are still testing things. I expect > that some stuff will be broken, but I don't think it'll be _that_ bad.Ahn, that's good to hear.>From our side, two of the bots have returned, and both are broken onmany (seemingly unrelated) tests. And they were the simplest ones. Bisection will be hard with breakages on top of others, and it will take a while to clean it up, which means more failures will trample over... Last time this happened to one of our bots, it took me three weeks to go back to green. If even only half of our bots go red in that state, we may be in it for the long run... :(> +1 to fixing quickly, but from what I understand just reverting isn't enough > since the master needs to be restarted after the revert for it to have an > effect.Indeed. It has to be Galina. cheers, --renato