thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast [Aug 2016]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Lin, Jin via llvm-dev

2016-Aug-17 17:39 UTC

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

Hi ,

The following loop fails to be vectorized since the load c[i] is casted as i64
and the store c[i] is double. The loop access analysis gives up since they are
in different types.

Since these two memory operations are in the same size, I believe the loop
access analysis should return forward dependence and thus the loop can be
vectorized.

Any comments?

Thanks,

Jin

#define N 1000
double a[N], b[N],c[N];
void foo() {
for (int i=0;i<N;i++) {
b[i] =c[i];
c[i]=0.0;
}
}

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body, %entry
  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]* @c, i64
0, i64 %indvars.iv
  %0 = bitcast double* %arrayidx to i64*
  %1 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !tbaa !1
  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]* @b, i64
0, i64 %indvars.iv
  %2 = bitcast double* %arrayidx2 to i64*
  store i64 %1, i64* %2, align 8, !tbaa !1
  store double 0.000000e+00, double* %arrayidx, align 8, !tbaa !1
  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 1000
  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body

LAA: Found a loop in foo: loop.17
LAA: Processing memory accesses...
  AST: Alias Set Tracker: 2 alias sets for 3 pointer values.
  AliasSet[0x9508b80, 1] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x i64>* %1,
18446744073709551615)
  AliasSet[0x95f8a70, 2] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x double>*
%2, 18446744073709551615), (<4 x i64>* %0, 18446744073709551615)

LAA:   Accesses(3):
          %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x i64>* (write)
          %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x double>* (write)
          %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x i64>* (read-only)
Underlying objects for pointer   %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x
i64>*
  @b = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
Underlying objects for pointer   %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
double>*
  @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
Underlying objects for pointer   %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
i64>*
  @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x
i64>*
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
double>*
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
i64>*
LAA: We need to do 0 pointer comparisons.
LAA: We can perform a memory runtime check if needed.
LAA: Checking memory dependencies
LAA: Src Scev: {@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>Sink Scev:
{@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>(Induction step: 1)
LAA: Distance for   %gepload = load <4 x i64>, <4 x i64>* %0, align
16, !tbaa !1 to   store <4 x double> zeroinitializer, <4 x double>*
%2, align 16, !tbaa !1: 0
LAA: Zero dependence difference but different types
Total Dependences: 1
LAA: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160817/04c8d000/attachment.html>

Michael Kuperstein via llvm-dev

2016-Aug-17 18:33 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

Hi Jin,

I agree, this looks wrong. The bitcasts are fallout from r226781 - and we
should be able to look through them if the size is the same.
Can you please file a PR?

Thanks,
  Michael

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Lin, Jin via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> The following loop fails to be vectorized since the load c[i] is casted as
> i64 and the store c[i] is double. The loop access analysis gives up since
> they are in different types.
>
>
>
> Since these two memory operations are in the same size, I believe the loop
> access analysis should return forward dependence and thus the loop can be
> vectorized.
>
>
>
> Any comments?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jin
>
>
>
> #define N 1000
>
> double a[N], b[N],c[N];
>
> void foo() {
>
> for (int i=0;i<N;i++) {
>
> b[i] =c[i];
>
> c[i]=0.0;
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body,
> %entry
>
>   %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
>
>   %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]* @c,
> i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv
>
>   %0 = bitcast double* %arrayidx to i64*
>
>   %1 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !tbaa !1
>
>   %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]*
> @b, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv
>
>   %2 = bitcast double* %arrayidx2 to i64*
>
>   store i64 %1, i64* %2, align 8, !tbaa !1
>
>   store double 0.000000e+00, double* %arrayidx, align 8, !tbaa !1
>
>   %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
>
>   %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 1000
>
>   br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
>
>
>
> LAA: Found a loop in foo: loop.17
>
> LAA: Processing memory accesses...
>
>   AST: Alias Set Tracker: 2 alias sets for 3 pointer values.
>
>   AliasSet[0x9508b80, 1] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x i64>*
%1,
> 18446744073709551615)
>
>   AliasSet[0x95f8a70, 2] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x
double>*
> %2, 18446744073709551615), (<4 x i64>* %0, 18446744073709551615)
>
>
>
> LAA:   Accesses(3):
>
>           %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x i64>* (write)
>
>           %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x double>* (write)
>
>           %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x i64>* (read-only)
>
> Underlying objects for pointer   %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4
x
> i64>*
>
>   @b = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer,
> align 16
>
> Underlying objects for pointer   %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
> double>*
>
>   @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer,
> align 16
>
> Underlying objects for pointer   %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
> i64>*
>
>   @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer,
> align 16
>
> LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4
x
> i64>*
>
> LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
> double>*
>
> LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
> i64>*
>
> LAA: We need to do 0 pointer comparisons.
>
> LAA: We can perform a memory runtime check if needed.
>
> LAA: Checking memory dependencies
>
> LAA: Src Scev: {@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>Sink Scev:
> {@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>(Induction step: 1)
>
> LAA: Distance for   %gepload = load <4 x i64>, <4 x i64>* %0,
align 16,
> !tbaa !1 to   store <4 x double> zeroinitializer, <4 x double>*
%2, align
> 16, !tbaa !1: 0
>
> LAA: Zero dependence difference but different types
>
> Total Dependences: 1
>
> LAA: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160817/bf788a9c/attachment.html>

Lin, Jin via llvm-dev

2016-Aug-17 19:05 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

Hi Michael,

Many thanks for your quick response. The PR 29021 has been filed to address this
issue.

Jin

From: Michael Kuperstein [mailto:mkuper at google.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Lin, Jin <jin.lin at intel.com>
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

Hi Jin,

I agree, this looks wrong. The bitcasts are fallout from r226781 - and we should
be able to look through them if the size is the same.
Can you please file a PR?

Thanks,
  Michael

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Lin, Jin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi ,

The following loop fails to be vectorized since the load c[i] is casted as i64
and the store c[i] is double. The loop access analysis gives up since they are
in different types.

Since these two memory operations are in the same size, I believe the loop
access analysis should return forward dependence and thus the loop can be
vectorized.

Any comments?

Thanks,

Jin

#define N 1000
double a[N], b[N],c[N];
void foo() {
for (int i=0;i<N;i++) {
b[i] =c[i];
c[i]=0.0;
}
}

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body, %entry
  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]* @c, i64
0, i64 %indvars.iv
  %0 = bitcast double* %arrayidx to i64*
  %1 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !tbaa !1
  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds [1000 x double], [1000 x double]* @b, i64
0, i64 %indvars.iv
  %2 = bitcast double* %arrayidx2 to i64*
  store i64 %1, i64* %2, align 8, !tbaa !1
  store double 0.000000e+00, double* %arrayidx, align 8, !tbaa !1
  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 1000
  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body

LAA: Found a loop in foo: loop.17
LAA: Processing memory accesses...
  AST: Alias Set Tracker: 2 alias sets for 3 pointer values.
  AliasSet[0x9508b80, 1] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x i64>* %1,
18446744073709551615)
  AliasSet[0x95f8a70, 2] must alias, No access Pointers: (<4 x double>*
%2, 18446744073709551615), (<4 x i64>* %0, 18446744073709551615)

LAA:   Accesses(3):
          %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x i64>* (write)
          %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x double>* (write)
          %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x i64>* (read-only)
Underlying objects for pointer   %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x
i64>*
  @b = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
Underlying objects for pointer   %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
double>*
  @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
Underlying objects for pointer   %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
i64>*
  @c = common local_unnamed_addr global [1000 x double] zeroinitializer, align
16
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %1 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx11 to <4 x
i64>*
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %2 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
double>*
LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:  %0 = bitcast double* %arrayIdx to <4 x
i64>*
LAA: We need to do 0 pointer comparisons.
LAA: We can perform a memory runtime check if needed.
LAA: Checking memory dependencies
LAA: Src Scev: {@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>Sink<mailto:%7b at
c,+,32%7d%3cnsw%3e%3c%25loop.17%3eSink> Scev:
{@c,+,32}<nsw><%loop.17>(Induction<mailto:%7b at
c,+,32%7d%3cnsw%3e%3c%25loop.17%3e(Induction> step: 1)
LAA: Distance for   %gepload = load <4 x i64>, <4 x i64>* %0, align
16, !tbaa !1 to   store <4 x double> zeroinitializer, <4 x double>*
%2, align 16, !tbaa !1: 0
LAA: Zero dependence difference but different types
Total Dependences: 1
LAA: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160817/be815516/attachment.html>

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

llvm dev - Aug 2016 - Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

[llvm-dev] Loop vectorization with the loop containing bitcast

Seemingly Similar Threads