llvm dev - Aug 2016 - Target Acceptance Policy

This looks good for me. Thank you for addressing this!

Yours,
Andrey


On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 29 July 2016 at 18:01, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote:
> > I don't know what the right number should be, to be honest. 2-3
sounds
> > better than 6, though, given the rate of change of the LLVM codebase.
>
> Good, that's the current version:
>
>  5. The target must have been stable in the tree and have addressed
> every other minimum requirement for at least 2-3 months. This cool down
> period is to make sure that the back-end and the target community can
> endure continuous upstream development for the foreseeable future.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160729/4f3e1e00/attachment.html>

If everybody is happy, I'll submit this as a docs patch to the
developer's policy.

cheers,
--renato

> On Aug 1, 2016, at 4:11 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> If everybody is happy, I'll submit this as a docs patch to the
> developer's policy.
Looks pretty nice to me.  Please CC me on the specific dox patch when you post
it, thanks!

-Chris