> On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:15, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > > I love D3. This is a great idea. Maybe we can finally kill flot! > > We are going to have to start using the html data attributes more; but that is a good thing IMO. > > D3 would greatly simply some of our CSS/templates too. I am regularly surprised how hard it is to make a cell turn colors in our current jinja macro setup. > > Is it okay to have D3 checked into the LNT repo, or should we use a CDN link?Not using a CDN link would mean you can work offline with an LNT server installed on your laptop, for example. Otherwise, I'm as happy with using a CDN link instead of importing it into the LNT repo. I can't think of another reason not to use a CDN link. I don't really have a strong preference either way. Do you have a preference? Thanks, Kristof
Using D3 sounds great to me, thanks! My preference is to have a checked in copy and update the LICENSE.txt appropriately. On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> wrote:> > > On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:15, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > I love D3. This is a great idea. Maybe we can finally kill flot! > > > > We are going to have to start using the html data attributes more; but > that is a good thing IMO. > > > > D3 would greatly simply some of our CSS/templates too. I am regularly > surprised how hard it is to make a cell turn colors in our current jinja > macro setup. > > > > Is it okay to have D3 checked into the LNT repo, or should we use a CDN > link? > > Not using a CDN link would mean you can work offline with an LNT server > installed on your laptop, for example. > Otherwise, I'm as happy with using a CDN link instead of importing it into > the LNT repo. I can't think of another reason not to use a CDN link. > I don't really have a strong preference either way. > > Do you have a preference? > > Thanks, > > Kristof >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160421/1ba18092/attachment.html>
Licence was my only concern. Checked in is my preference as well. Thanks Kristof!> On Apr 21, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > Using D3 sounds great to me, thanks! > > My preference is to have a checked in copy and update the LICENSE.txt appropriately. > > On Thursday, April 21, 2016, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com <mailto:Kristof.Beyls at arm.com>> wrote: > > > On 21 Apr 2016, at 17:15, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > I love D3. This is a great idea. Maybe we can finally kill flot! > > > > We are going to have to start using the html data attributes more; but that is a good thing IMO. > > > > D3 would greatly simply some of our CSS/templates too. I am regularly surprised how hard it is to make a cell turn colors in our current jinja macro setup. > > > > Is it okay to have D3 checked into the LNT repo, or should we use a CDN link? > > Not using a CDN link would mean you can work offline with an LNT server installed on your laptop, for example. > Otherwise, I'm as happy with using a CDN link instead of importing it into the LNT repo. I can't think of another reason not to use a CDN link. > I don't really have a strong preference either way. > > Do you have a preference? > > Thanks, > > Kristof-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160421/d791e276/attachment.html>