Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 04:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm still a bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > > Can you pleas take care of this? > > > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > - Sedat - > > > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 > > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160106/24e7692c/attachment.html>
Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 05:05 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:50:18PM -0600, Brian Cain via llvm-dev wrote:> Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I > uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm still a > bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? >Hi Brian, I see them on the server, but I missed downloading them because the files aren't globally readable (i.e. The file permissions are 0740, but should be 0744). If you re-upload them with the correct permissions, I will upload them to the website. -Tom> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > > > Can you pleas take care of this? > > > > > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Regards, > > > - Sedat - > > > > > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 > > > > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. > > > > - Sedat - > > > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > > > > -- > -Brian> _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 05:17 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Oh, yes, I see. I've fixed it w/a chmod. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:50:18PM -0600, Brian Cain via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I > > uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm > still a > > bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? > > > > Hi Brian, > > I see them on the server, but I missed downloading them because the > files aren't globally readable (i.e. The file permissions are 0740, > but should be 0744). If you re-upload them with the correct > permissions, I will upload them to the website. > > -Tom > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 > tarballs. > > > > Can you pleas take care of this? > > > > > > > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > > > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > - Sedat - > > > > > > > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 > > > > > > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. > > > > > > - Sedat - > > > > > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160106/27511aa5/attachment.html>
Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 11:12 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:50:18PM -0600, Brian Cain via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I >> uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm still a >> bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? >> > > Hi Brian, > > I see them on the server, but I missed downloading them because the > files aren't globally readable (i.e. The file permissions are 0740, > but should be 0744). If you re-upload them with the correct > permissions, I will upload them to the website. >The announce email [1] now exists but on the main/home website there is no entry for v3.7.1. See <http://llvm.org/> -> "Download" (and -> "Releases") websites. - Sedat - [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-announce/2016-January/000066.html> -Tom > > >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Hi Tom, >> > > >> > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. >> > > Can you pleas take care of this? >> > > >> > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. >> > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > - Sedat - >> > > >> > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 >> > >> > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. >> > >> > - Sedat - >> > >> > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > LLVM Developers mailing list >> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> -Brian > >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >