llvm dev - Nov 2015 - 3.7.1 Release Update - Stable patches deadeline extended to November 9 - testers needed

Hi,

I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so I've
decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
going into llvm 3.7.2.

I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on phabricator.

As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
in doing testing, let me know.

Thanks,
Tom

On 05/11/15 23:43, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
Can test for Ubuntu 14.04 and 15.10 x86_64.

Ben

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
>
Can test for Windows x64.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151106/34d01292/attachment.html>

Hi Tom,

I have a patch, r249165, which fixed PR21695 and also fixes PR20025.

It's small and self contained. Shall I apply?

cheers,
--renato

On 5 November 2015 at 15:43, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>
> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
phabricator.
>
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>
> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
phabricator.
>
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
Happy to build and test for Windows as usual.

Cheers,
Hans

On 05 Nov 2015, at 16:43, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
Hi Tom,

I will do the testing for FreeBSD, as usual.

-Dimitry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151106/75648f1f/attachment.sig>

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:58:15PM +0000, Renato Golin
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I have a patch, r249165, which fixed PR21695 and also fixes PR20025.
> 
We just need Tim's approval.  I have opened an audit for this:

http://reviews.llvm.org/rL249165

-Tom
> It's small and self contained. Shall I apply?
> 
> cheers,
> --renato
> 
> On 5 November 2015 at 15:43, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> > decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> > would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> > November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> > more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> > going into llvm 3.7.2.
> >
> > I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to
make
> > sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> > forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
phabricator.
> >
> > As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> > in doing testing, let me know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

Count me in for OS X testing.

Cheers,
Sebastian

2015-11-05 16:43 GMT+01:00 Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>
> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
> phabricator.
>
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151108/7d72de94/attachment.html>

> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
I'll test MIPS as usual.

I want to help testing this release. I work for Facebook and can test cfe on our
backends codebase.
Should I use release_37 branch for this? Where can I find what work is still in
progress for this release?

Thanks,
Igor

________________________________________
From: cfe-dev [cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Tom Stellard via
cfe-dev [cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 7:43 AM
To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: [cfe-dev] 3.7.1 Release Update - Stable patches deadeline extended to
November 9 - testers needed

Hi,

I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so I've
decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
going into llvm 3.7.2.

I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on phabricator.

As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
in doing testing, let me know.

Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=CwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=LlbfLxvkyuVVPfVvG7EAbQ&m=F6qipMyjT4LWVECOg11-Cb3dqswDsw7GxdJrHrbCmDw&s=3JVhLGpTtyPxz3BDvjAFXweROu34vNUX0fuWlJ6hrvI&e=

Tom,

In anticipation of 3.7.1 I tried to build a release of 3.7.0 against SuSE
Linux Enterprise 11.3.  Some of the test suite fails to compile.  It looks
like it requires features not yet availabke in that distro. Is there a
minimum supported glibc version?

Assuming there is and it's newer than what's available, could I instead
build the release tarball against musl?
On Nov 5, 2015 9:45 AM, "Tom Stellard via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>
> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
> phabricator.
>
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151113/49f1e903/attachment.html>

I'll do Fedora and openSUSE as usual.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Brian Cain via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> In anticipation of 3.7.1 I tried to build a release of 3.7.0 against SuSE
> Linux Enterprise 11.3.  Some of the test suite fails to compile.  It looks
> like it requires features not yet availabke in that distro. Is there a
> minimum supported glibc version?
>
> Assuming there is and it's newer than what's available, could I
instead
> build the release tarball against musl?
> On Nov 5, 2015 9:45 AM, "Tom Stellard via llvm-dev" <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
>> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
>> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
>> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
>> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
>> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>>
>> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to
make
>> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
>> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
>> phabricator.
>>
>> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
>> in doing testing, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151115/c3294eb0/attachment.html>

Tom, I tried building 3.7.0 for SuSE Linux Enterprise 11SP3.  It failed to
build some specific test cases for lack of specific (new) pthread function
declarations.  Assuming the problem is that the glibc is too old to be
supported by clang/llvm, can I build a 3.7.1 release against musl instead?
On Nov 5, 2015 9:45 AM, "Tom Stellard via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know a lot of people were busy with the dev-meeting last week, so
I've
> decided to continue to accept stable patches until November 9.  I
> would still like to keep the original schedule of an -rc1 release on
> November 10, so if there are any newly submitted patches that take
> more than a few days to get approved, they will probably end up
> going into llvm 3.7.2.
>
> I am currently working through my list of candidate stable patches to make
> sure everything is getting approved / merged.  If you think I may have
> forgotten about your patch, please ping the thread or the audit on
> phabricator.
>
> As always we need testers for the releases, so if you are interested
> in doing testing, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151117/11a92309/attachment.html>

On 18 November 2015 at 01:09, Brian Cain via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Tom, I tried building 3.7.0 for SuSE Linux Enterprise 11SP3.  It failed to
> build some specific test cases for lack of specific (new) pthread function
> declarations.  Assuming the problem is that the glibc is too old to be
> supported by clang/llvm, can I build a 3.7.1 release against musl instead?
Was Suse's 3.7.0 built against Musl?

--renato