Rohan Bajaj via llvm-dev
2015-Aug-31 22:48 UTC
[llvm-dev] Do Frontends need to care about alignment?
Philip Reames via llvm-dev
2015-Aug-31 23:16 UTC
[llvm-dev] Do Frontends need to care about alignment?
Sometimes. On 08/31/2015 03:48 PM, Rohan Bajaj via llvm-dev wrote:> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150831/bb33d25b/attachment.html>
Rohan Bajaj via llvm-dev
2015-Sep-01 00:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] Do Frontends need to care about alignment?
Meant to add more text, but somehow the email got sent. Could you explain why for some of these cases? If I set the right target and only want to operate with the system C ABI, will LLVM not generate correct code if I want to pay say structs to a system defined function? I see clang specifying alignment, but I'm not sure why. I want to understand beyond alignment and function ABI (which for my case is also system's C ABI) what makes my LLVM IR platform dependent. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:> Sometimes. > > On 08/31/2015 03:48 PM, Rohan Bajaj via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing listllvm-dev at lists.llvm.orghttp://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150831/163635d0/attachment.html>