similar to: Do Frontends need to care about alignment?

Meant to add more text, but somehow the email got sent. Could you explain why for some of these cases? If I set the right target and only want to operate with the system C ABI, will LLVM not generate correct code if I want to pay say structs to a system defined function? I see clang specifying alignment, but I'm not sure why. I want to understand beyond alignment and function ABI (which for

Is making PDB files for corresponding IR supported in LLVM latest version? After some searching I see llvm-pdbdump, but I want to annotate the IR with debug information so that when I write bitcode it has pdb information. I've heard of CodeView, but it seems to be only for line information. I want variable values also. I would be ok to use DWARF if Visual Studio could understand it using

On 05/08/2018 07:13 PM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev wrote: > It's probably worth going into a little more detail... a lot of people > read llvmdev, and most of them won't click the link or follow the > whole discussion. > > The transform in question is replacing "fputc(...)" with > "fputc_unlocked(...)" when we can prove the FILE* doesn't escape. 

Reverted: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL314922 On Oct 4, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: + Rui, the patch author Do we know what the oldest glibc which works with this patch is? For context, the most recent REHL 5 ships with glibc 2.5. REHL 6 ships with 2.12 and REHL ships with 2.17. I have evidence

I tried to unmount a btrfs filesystem located in a external usb hard drive. This belonged to a raid1 data and metadata filesystem mounted in degraded mode. Unfortunately, I couldn''t save the image of filesystem but I could see this error in kern.log: Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [ 3747.840027] usb 1-3: new high-speed USB device number 8 using ehci_hcd Aug 4 02:23:55 rohan kernel: [

Yes, I have done exactly the same. The wawanalyzer is the same. I changed ARM.h and ARMTargetMachine.cpp in the tager/arm folder. then I make tool/llc and lib folder. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:55 AM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/17/15 12:16 AM, fateme Hoseini via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, > So, I run my pass in X86 target with llc command and it printed

Hello, I have installed samba 3.0.2a as PDC and BDC, I am able to add windows xp to domain and have added all the registry patches to windows xp, but when it comes to domain logon on windows xp client, the behaviour is very erratic, sometimes I am able to logon to domain and sometimes the domain logon fails, we need to restart the xp machine and keep trying to the domain logon. The error we

Our build system is setup to deliberately use a very old environment.  We've found that's one of the most reliable easy ways to ensure we don't accidentally introduce a dependency on a newer system library than intended.  This lets us ship prebuilt binaries which run on a wide spectrum of systems.  We're going to chat internally and check to see if we can roll this forward a

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:35 AM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > > On 01/16/2018 09:21 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > > Context: I've been looking at experimenting with using Modular Code > Generation (My talk at last year's LLVM dev meeting > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYYxDXgbUZ0 is about the best reference > at the

I was actually using `git llvm` in my daily workflow. Could you explain why we want people to move away from that script? In addition to the convenience, it prevented me from accidentally creating a new branch (which I did before with push once). Cheers,   Johannes On 5/11/20 11:43 AM, Zola Bridges via llvm-dev wrote: > Deleted this morning. Thanks! > Zola Bridges > > > On

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31920 Summary: Brightness control is erratic (/sys/class/backlight/nv_backlight/max_brightness is wrong) Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Thanks so much John! That works :) Previously I wrote a pass that inherited from CallGraphWrapperPass and used its getCallGraph() function within runOnModule() which resulted in segmentation faults for me. Not sure why that happened, perhaps callgraph wasn't setup by the time runOnModule() was called internally. If you know why, kindly enlighten me and perhaps document the behavior for the

Hi, I want to cross-compile samba for arm-linux. I have host machine: Red Had Enterprise Edition 5.0 and I am not able to cross compile it. I tried 3-4 Versions of samba but in vain. Can you guide me through compiling process.Which stable version of samba should i use?Step by step cross compilation process.OR If you have binaries or package for samba which i can?directly?use ?at my arm machine.

> On Aug 8, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Dmitry Mikushin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Cool, thanks! > > вс, 9 авг. 2020 г. в 00:27, Petr Hosek <phosek at chromium.org <mailto:phosek at chromium.org>>: > You can set the LLVM_PARALLEL_LINK_JOBS CMake variable to restrict the number of link jobs. IMO, a more thorough solution would be switching to

Hello, I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this. >From an XP machine printing to a SAMBA printer, printing is painfully slow. Selecting the printer, and even sending the job through windows makes the app appear non-responsive. The print job is completed fine, but just takes a long time to print. XP boxes with SP1 print like a dream. I've managed to replicate this on 4 boxes

On 01/16/2018 09:21 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > Context: I've been looking at experimenting with using Modular Code > Generation (My talk at last year's LLVM dev meeting > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYYxDXgbUZ0 is about the best > reference at the moment) when building the LLVM project, as a good > experiment for the feature. This can/does enforce a

No i have not worked previously on llvm. I have looked through the projects but because of no prior experience i am unable to pick one. I am currently going through the llvm tutorials. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:32 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/8/16 10:12 AM, Om Shivom Nagpal via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi, I am Om Shivom pursuing CSE from PEC University of

Hi, we generally run our JIT with UnsafeFPMath enabled, but there are a few specific instances where a block of code needs to follow strict FPMath. Is there a way to temporarily override TargetOptions for a specific block of IR? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am Om Shivom pursuing CSE from PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh and I have previously worked on C++ and Python. I am interested in contributing to llvm through GSOC 2016. I need a little guidance on how to get started here. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Sorry, by debug build I actually meant asserts enabled.  Thus, this issue can show up in either a debug or release build, if asserts are enabled. On 10/26/2017 4:05 PM, Chad Rosier via llvm-dev wrote: > > Chandler/All, > > We've just started testing the new pass manager this week and we ran > into a 548x slowdown (i.e., 6.28s to 3443.83s) for one of the files > from