llvm dev - May 2015 - [LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and how it is used to reduce false positives

I agree. Fixed in r237748.
> On May 18, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com>
wrote:
> 
> BTW – graphs like the one in attachment make me think that the LNT webUI
should be showing
> sample points by default instead of line graphs showing the minimum
execution time
> per build number.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150519/771daa0e/attachment.html>

Thanks!

I guess someone will need to restart the LNT server at llvm.org/perf to pick up
this change?

Renato, do you have access to restart the LNT server at llvm.org/perf?

 

Kristof

 

From: Chris Matthews [mailto:chris.matthews at apple.com] 
Sent: 20 May 2015 01:04
To: Kristof Beyls
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Proposal: change LNT’s regression detection algorithm and
how it is used to reduce false positives

 

I agree. Fixed in r237748.

 

On May 18, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com>
wrote:

 

BTW – graphs like the one in attachment make me think that the LNT webUI should
be showing
sample points by default instead of line graphs showing the minimum execution
time
per build number.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150520/fd0b4c57/attachment.html>

On 20 May 2015 at 13:22, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com>
wrote:
> Renato, do you have access to restart the LNT server at llvm.org/perf?
I do, but there are other services running on that machine. I'd prefer
if Tanya or someone else would restart it.

cheers,
--renato