llvm dev - May 2015 - [LLVMdev] Buildbot for Windows native LLVM/Clang testing

2015-05-03 21:02 GMT+09:00 Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at
gmail.com>:
> I now tried the extra tests and get the same failures:
>
>     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp
>     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp
>
> Takumi, I see you added requires:shell in r211831 and r220837.
>
> When using MSYS requires:shell is true but test fail,  is it OK to
> XFAIL:win32 these two tests?
No. Consider if --host=linux --target=*-win32.
I know I tend to suppress tests easily with REQUIRES:shell.
We might introduce other suppression, like "target-ms" and
"host-ms", then.

I have uninstalled bash/sh and tests are skipped as expected:

UNSUPPORTED: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp (6991 of 22121)
UNSUPPORTED: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp (6995 of 22121)

So there are no unexpected fails in clang-x64-ninja-win7 buildbot more.

--Vera

-----Original Message-----
From: NAKAMURA Takumi [mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 15:16
To: Yaron Keren
Cc: Fedorova, Vera; Reid Kleckner; Pawel Bylica; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Buildbot for Windows native LLVM/Clang testing

2015-05-03 21:02 GMT+09:00 Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at
gmail.com>:
> I now tried the extra tests and get the same failures:
>
>     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp
>     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp
>
> Takumi, I see you added requires:shell in r211831 and r220837.
>
> When using MSYS requires:shell is true but test fail,  is it OK to
> XFAIL:win32 these two tests?
No. Consider if --host=linux --target=*-win32.
I know I tend to suppress tests easily with REQUIRES:shell.
We might introduce other suppression, like "target-ms" and
"host-ms", then.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park, 
17 Krylatskaya Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614, 
Russian Federation

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

Yes, this is with Ninja.
If MSYS is installed there is sh.exe and the tests are not skipped.


2015-05-15 17:24 GMT+03:00 Fedorova, Vera <vera.fedorova at intel.com>:
> I have uninstalled bash/sh and tests are skipped as expected:
>
> UNSUPPORTED: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp (6991 of 22121)
> UNSUPPORTED: Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp (6995 of 22121)
>
> So there are no unexpected fails in clang-x64-ninja-win7 buildbot more.
>
> --Vera
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NAKAMURA Takumi [mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 15:16
> To: Yaron Keren
> Cc: Fedorova, Vera; Reid Kleckner; Pawel Bylica; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Buildbot for Windows native LLVM/Clang testing
>
> 2015-05-03 21:02 GMT+09:00 Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com>:
> > I now tried the extra tests and get the same failures:
> >
> >     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/clang-tidy-diff.cpp
> >     Clang Tools :: clang-tidy/file-filter.cpp
> >
> > Takumi, I see you added requires:shell in r211831 and r220837.
> >
> > When using MSYS requires:shell is true but test fail,  is it OK to
> > XFAIL:win32 these two tests?
>
> No. Consider if --host=linux --target=*-win32.
> I know I tend to suppress tests easily with REQUIRES:shell.
> We might introduce other suppression, like "target-ms" and
"host-ms", then.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park,
> 17 Krylatskaya Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614,
> Russian Federation
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150515/997fafb2/attachment.html>