Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty empty. Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. Cheers, Hans 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html 2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
On Friday, January 09, 2015 08:32 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:> Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. > > Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For > example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty > empty. > > Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. > > Cheers, > Hans > > 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > 2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html >Happy to test on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64. Ben
On 9 January 2015 at 00:51, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote:> Happy to test on Ubuntu 14.04 x86_64.ARM and AArch64 here. --renato
On 09/01/2015 01:32, Hans Wennborg wrote:> Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. > > Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For > example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty > empty. > > Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. > >Happy to test, all Debian archs. Sylvestre
I'll test on FreeBSD, as usual. Note that trunk has been failing "check-all" on FreeBSD for some time now, due to this: FAIL: Clang :: CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp (627 of 20130) ******************** TEST 'Clang :: CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include -nostdsysteminc -std=c++98 /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include -nostdsysteminc -std=c++11 /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include -nostdsysteminc -std=c++14 /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /home/dim/obj/llvm-r225586-aconf/Release+Asserts/bin/../lib/clang/3.6.0/include -nostdsysteminc -std=c++1z /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp -verify -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -- Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected: File /share/dim/src/llvm/trunk/tools/clang/test/CXX/drs/dr6xx.cpp Line 259: static_assert failed "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__ but all basic source characters have same representation" 1 error generated. -- It looks like the interpretation of what "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__" means differs between the llvm developers and the FreeBSD developers. I'm not sure what a good solution is. -Dimitry> On 09 Jan 2015, at 01:32, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > Reminder: The plan is to create the 3.6 branch next week, on 14 January. > > Please help get the release notes and other documents updated. For > example, both the LLVM [1] and Clang [2] release notes look pretty > empty. > > Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know. > > Cheers, > Hans > > 1. http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > 2. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150110/be795279/attachment.sig>
On 10 Jan 2015, at 17:35, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:> > It looks like the interpretation of what "__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__" means differs between the llvm developers and the FreeBSD developers. I'm not sure what a good solution is.I've just read the relevant parts of the C11 spec, and it's not really clear to me what the 'basic character set' is. There are two possible interpretations: - The set of characters that can be represented by a char in locale "C" - The set of characters that can be represented by a char in *any* locale On FreeBSD, it is correct to define __STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__ for the second definition, but not for the first. Can anyone point to something in the spec that clarifies this? David
2015-01-09 1:32 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>:> [...] > Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know.I'm again in for testing OS X. Cheers, Sebastian
I'll be doing Mips. ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Sebastian Dreßler [sebastian.dressler at gmail.com] Sent: 10 January 2015 21:21 To: Hans Wennborg Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Reminder: 3.6 branch is coming 2015-01-09 1:32 GMT+01:00 Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>:> [...] > Also, if you'd like to volunteer to be a release tester, please let me know.I'm again in for testing OS X. Cheers, Sebastian _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev