llvm dev - Jul 2014 - [LLVMdev] [lld] [mach-o]: RFC: representing LC_REEXPORT_DYLIB

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:09:14PM -0700, Nick Kledzik
wrote:
> Shankar, Does lld for ELF support loading indirect DSOs?
It doesn't, which is a bug.

Joerg

Hi joerg,

Gnu linker does not support for some reason as well, if we are emulating the gnu
behavior it might be good to handle it in the same way.

No ??

Thanks

Shankar Easwaran 

Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 5, 2014, at 15:25, "Joerg Sonnenberger [via LLVM]"
<ml-node+s1065342n70193h66 at n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:09:14PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: 
> > Shankar, Does lld for ELF support loading indirect DSOs? 
> 
> It doesn't, which is a bug. 
> 
> Joerg 
> _______________________________________________ 
> LLVM Developers mailing list 
> [hidden email]         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
>
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/lld-mach-o-RFC-representing-LC-REEXPORT-DYLIB-tp70081p70193.html
> To start a new topic under LLVM - Dev, email ml-node+s1065342n3h76 at
n5.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from LLVM - Dev, click here.
> NAML



--
View this message in context:
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/lld-mach-o-RFC-representing-LC-REEXPORT-DYLIB-tp70081p70194.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140705/58266108/attachment.html>

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 01:33:11PM -0700, shankarke
wrote:
> Gnu linker does not support for some reason as well, if we are
> emulating the gnu behavior it might be good to handle it in the same way.
Binutils broke the ELF behavior with some recent versions. That is not
something to follow.

Joerg