llvm dev - Feb 2014 - [LLVMdev] llvm.org/perf internal server error

I agree that we should add this feature. No point in submitting results that we
don’t plan to use.

On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 12 February 2014 18:21, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>
wrote:
>> lnt has a flag to do not report the results.
> 
> Not in the bots config.
> 
> I had a look at it last time, but my patch wasn't good enough and my
> python skills aren't anything to be proud of. Since perf was fixed, I
> just gave up. ;)
> 
> Maybe I ought to do it, with it failing consistently...
> 
> --renato

Daniel has restarted the LNT server.  Submissions should be working now.

I think we should do a few things:

1) Change the default logging strategy in LNT.  We should be emailing the
sysadmin on all ISEs.

2) Update the bots to make submission optional, and don’t submit when not
wanted.

3) Split the bot’s use of LNT up to have a separate submission step.  Then mark
this new submission step as warn on fail.  That will isolate server failures
from testing and run failures, and if the server does fail, the run will only be
marked as warning and not a full failure.


On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com>
wrote:
> I agree that we should add this feature. No point in submitting results
that we don’t plan to use.
> 
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 12 February 2014 18:21, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>
wrote:
>>> lnt has a flag to do not report the results.
>> 
>> Not in the bots config.
>> 
>> I had a look at it last time, but my patch wasn't good enough and
my
>> python skills aren't anything to be proud of. Since perf was fixed,
I
>> just gave up. ;)
>> 
>> Maybe I ought to do it, with it failing consistently...
>> 
>> --renato
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On 12 February 2014 22:06, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com>
wrote:
> 1) Change the default logging strategy in LNT.  We should be emailing the
sysadmin on all ISEs.
>
> 2) Update the bots to make submission optional, and don't submit when
not wanted.
>
> 3) Split the bot's use of LNT up to have a separate submission step. 
Then mark this new submission step as warn on fail.  That will isolate server
failures from testing and run failures, and if the server does fail, the run
will only be marked as warning and not a full failure.
Excellent plan! I agree the default should be to not submit.

thanks,
--renato